The evolution of HIV‐1 entry phenotypes as a guide to changing target cells. Issue 3 (1st February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Joseph, Sarah B.; Swanstrom, Ronald
• Other Names: Dieli Francesco guestEditor.; Mikulak Joana guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of leukocyte biology. Volume 103:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 421
• Page End: 431
• Publication Date: 2018-02-01
• Subjects: CCR5 -- CXCR4 -- entry phenotype -- envelope -- HIV‐1 -- reservoir -- R5 T cell‐tropic -- M‐Tropic -- Macrophage -- X4 T cell‐tropic; Leucocytes -- Periodicals; Reticulo-endothelial system -- Periodicals; 571.96
• DOI: 10.1002/JLB.2RI0517-200R
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0741-5400

Abstract

Abstract: Through a twist of fate the most common form of HIV‐1, as defined by entry phenotype, was not appreciated until recently. The entry phenotype is closely linked to the target cell and thus to virus–host interactions and pathogenesis. The most abundant form of HIV‐1 uses CCR5 as the coreceptor and requires a high density of CD4 for efficient entry, defining its target cell as the CD4+ memory T cell. This is the transmitted form of the virus, the form that is found in the blood, and the form that rebounds from the latent reservoir. When CD4+/CCR5+ T cells become limiting the virus evolves to use alternative target cells to support viral replication. In the CNS, the virus can evolve to use a cell that displays only a low density of CD4, while maintaining the use of CCR5 as the coreceptor. When this evolutionary variant evolves, it must be sustaining its replication in either macrophages or microglial cells, which display only a low density of CD4 relative to that on T cells. In the blood and lymphoid system, the major switch late in disease is from T cells expressing CD4 and CCR5 to T cells expressing CD4 and CXCR4, with a change in coreceptor specificity. Thus the virus responds in two different ways to different environments when its preferred target cell becomes limiting.