Computational methods and challenges in hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. Issue 5 (7th September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Claesen, Jürgen; Burzykowski, Tomasz
• Other Names: Valkenborg Dirk guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Mass spectrometry reviews. Volume 36:Issue 5(2017:Sep./Oct.)
• Page Start: 649
• Page End: 667
• Publication Date: 2016-09-07
• Subjects: hydrogen/deuterium exchange -- mass spectrometry -- analysis; Mass spectrometry -- Periodicals; 543
• DOI: 10.1002/mas.21519
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-7037

Abstract

Abstract : Hydrogen/Deuterium exchange (HDX) has been applied, since the 1930s, as an analytical tool to study the structure and dynamics of (small) biomolecules. The popularity of using HDX to study proteins increased drastically in the last two decades due to the successful combination with mass spectrometry (MS). Together with this growth in popularity, several technological advances have been made, such as improved quenching and fragmentation. As a consequence of these experimental improvements and the increased use of protein‐HDXMS, large amounts of complex data are generated, which require appropriate analysis. Computational analysis of HDXMS requires several steps. A typical workflow for proteins consists of identification of (non‐)deuterated peptides or fragments of the protein under study (local analysis), or identification of the deuterated protein as a whole (global analysis); determination of the deuteration level; estimation of the protection extent or exchange rates of the labile backbone amide hydrogen atoms; and a statistically sound interpretation of the estimated protection extent or exchange rates. Several algorithms, specifically designed for HDX analysis, have been proposed. They range from procedures that focus on one specific step in the analysis of HDX data to complete HDX workflow analysis tools. In this review, we provide an overview of the computational methods and discuss outstanding challenges. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Mass Spec Rev 36:649–667, 2017