Injectable simvastatin gel for minimally invasive periosteal distraction: In vitro and in vivo studies in rat. Issue 2 (18th December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hao, Jia; Chou, Joshua; Kuroda, Shinji; Otsuka, Makoto; Kasugai, Shohei; Lang, Niklaus P.
• Is Part Of: Clinical oral implants research. Volume 29:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 227
• Page End: 234
• Publication Date: 2017-12-18
• Subjects: bone augmentation -- periosteal distraction -- simvastatin -- strontium; Dental implants -- Research -- Periodicals; 617.69
• DOI: 10.1111/clr.13105
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0905-7161

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate whether the subperiosteal injection of simvastatin (SIM) with a novel in situ gel‐forming system, SrHA/Alg (strontium hydroxyapatite/alginate), can stimulate vertical bone augmentation in a rat calvarial model. Material and methods: The SrHA/Alg solution was synthesized and combined with different doses of SIM (0.01, 0.02, 0.1, and 0.2 mg) to form the following groups: (1) SrHA/Alg only, (2) SrHA/Alg/0.01, (3) SrHA/Alg/0.02, (4) SrHA/Alg/0.1, and (5) SrHA/Alg/0.2. The SIM release pattern was analyzed, and rat primary periosteum‐derived cell (PDC) responses were investigated. Twenty male Wistar rats were enrolled in the calvarial subperiosteal injection experiment with each animal receiving a 200‐μl single subperiosteal injection of SrHA/Alg with different amounts of SIM (0, 0.01, 0.02, and 0.1 mg) incorporated ( n = 5). The 0.2 mg dose group was not tested in vivo due to the severe toxicity found in vitro. The new bone formation was assessed histologically and radiologically at 8 weeks. Results: The slow release of SIM was confirmed, and PDC viability decreased in the SrHA/Alg/0.2 group. Alkaline phosphatase positive areas and mineralization areas were significantly greater in the SrHA/Alg/0.01 and SrHA/Alg/0.02 groups ( p < .05). The mRNA expression level of Runx2 significantly increased in the SrHA/Alg/SIM‐0.02 group by day 7 ( p < .05) and significantly higher levels of VEGF were found in the SrHA/Alg/0.01 and SrHA/Alg/0.02 groups at different time points ( p < .05). In vivo, no prominent clinical sign of inflammation was observed, and the most significant bone gain was shown in the SrHA/Alg/0.02 group ( p < .05). The osteoclast formation within the newly formed bone area was reduced in the SrHA/Alg/0.1 group ( p < .05). Conclusions: When combined with SrHA/Alg system, the 0.02 mg SIM seemed to be the optimal dose to stimulate subperiosteal bone formation without inducing inflammation. This combination may hold potential therapeutic benefits for clinical bone augmentation in a minimally invasive manner.