Protein complex analysis: From raw protein lists to protein interaction networks. Issue 5 (28th December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Meysman, Pieter; Titeca, Kevin; Eyckerman, Sven; Tavernier, Jan; Goethals, Bart; Martens, Lennart; Valkenborg, Dirk; Laukens, Kris
• Other Names: Valkenborg Dirk guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Mass spectrometry reviews. Volume 36:Issue 5(2017:Sep./Oct.)
• Page Start: 600
• Page End: 614
• Publication Date: 2015-12-28
• Subjects: bioinformatics -- co‐complex purification -- protein–protein interaction networks; Mass spectrometry -- Periodicals; 543
• DOI: 10.1002/mas.21485
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-7037

Abstract

Abstract : The elucidation of molecular interaction networks is one of the pivotal challenges in the study of biology. Affinity purification—mass spectrometry and other co‐complex methods have become widely employed experimental techniques to identify protein complexes. These techniques typically suffer from a high number of false negatives and false positive contaminants due to technical shortcomings and purification biases. To support a diverse range of experimental designs and approaches, a large number of computational methods have been proposed to filter, infer and validate protein interaction networks from experimental pull‐down MS data. Nevertheless, this expansion of available methods complicates the selection of the most optimal ones to support systems biology‐driven knowledge extraction. In this review, we give an overview of the most commonly used computational methods to process and interpret co‐complex results, and we discuss the issues and unsolved problems that still exist within the field. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Mass Spec Rev 36:600–614, 2017