A comparison of genomic profiles of complex diseases under different models. Issue 1 (December 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comparison of genomic profiles of complex diseases under different models. Issue 1 (December 2015)
- Main Title:
- A comparison of genomic profiles of complex diseases under different models
- Authors:
- Potenciano, Víctor
Abad-Grau, María
Alcina, Antonio
Matesanz, Fuencisla - Abstract:
- Abstract Background Various approaches are being used to predict individual risk to polygenic diseases from data provided by genome-wide association studies. As there are substantial differences between the diseases investigated, the data sets used and the way they are tested, it is difficult to assess which models are more suitable for this task. Results We compared different approaches for seven complex diseases provided by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) under a within-study validation approach. Risk models were inferred using a variety of learning machines and assumptions about the underlying genetic model, including a haplotype-based approach with different haplotype lengths and different thresholds in association levels to choose loci as part of the predictive model. In accordance with previous work, our results generally showed low accuracy considering disease heritability and population prevalence. However, the boosting algorithm returned a predictive area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.8805 for Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 0.8087 for rheumatoid arthritis, both clearly over the AUC obtained by other approaches and over 0.75, which is the minimum required for a disease to be successfully tested on a sample at risk, which means that boosting is a promising approach. Its good performance seems to be related to its robustness to redundant data, as in the case of genome-wide data sets due to linkage disequilibrium. Conclusions In view of our results, theAbstract Background Various approaches are being used to predict individual risk to polygenic diseases from data provided by genome-wide association studies. As there are substantial differences between the diseases investigated, the data sets used and the way they are tested, it is difficult to assess which models are more suitable for this task. Results We compared different approaches for seven complex diseases provided by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) under a within-study validation approach. Risk models were inferred using a variety of learning machines and assumptions about the underlying genetic model, including a haplotype-based approach with different haplotype lengths and different thresholds in association levels to choose loci as part of the predictive model. In accordance with previous work, our results generally showed low accuracy considering disease heritability and population prevalence. However, the boosting algorithm returned a predictive area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.8805 for Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 0.8087 for rheumatoid arthritis, both clearly over the AUC obtained by other approaches and over 0.75, which is the minimum required for a disease to be successfully tested on a sample at risk, which means that boosting is a promising approach. Its good performance seems to be related to its robustness to redundant data, as in the case of genome-wide data sets due to linkage disequilibrium. Conclusions In view of our results, the boosting approach may be suitable for modeling individual predisposition to Type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis based on genome-wide data and should be considered for more in-depth research. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMC medical genomics. Volume 9:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- BMC medical genomics
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0009-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 1
- Page End:
- 16
- Publication Date:
- 2015-12
- Subjects:
- Medical genetics -- Periodicals
Genomics -- Periodicals
616.042 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedgenomics ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=573&action=archive ↗
http://link.springer.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1186/s12920-015-0157-2 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1755-8794
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10524.xml