Developmental assessment of preterm infants: Chronological or corrected age?. (September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Harel-Gadassi, Ayelet; Friedlander, Edwa; Yaari, Maya; Bar-Oz, Benjamin; Eventov-Friedman, Smadar; Mankuta, David; Yirmiya, Nurit
• Is Part Of: Research in developmental disabilities. Volume 80(2018)
• Page Start: 35
• Page End: 43
• Publication Date: 2018-09
• Subjects: Cognitive development -- Mullen scales of early learning -- Corrected age -- Chronological age -- Preterm infants; Developmental disabilities -- Periodicals; Developmentally disabled -- Research -- United States -- Periodicals; Developmentally disabled children -- Education -- Research -- United States -- Periodicals; Developmental Disabilities -- Periodicals; Disabled -- Periodicals; Mental Retardation -- rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Personnes atteintes de troubles du développement -- Recherche -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; Enfants atteints de troubles du développement -- Éducation -- Recherche -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; Développement, Troubles du -- Recherche -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; 616.858800
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.06.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0891-4222

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of age correction on the developmental assessment scores of preterm infants, using for the first time, the Mullen scales of early learning (MSEL) test. Participants included 110 preterm infants (born at a gestational age of ≤ 34 weeks) at ages 1, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months. The corrected age-based MSEL composite score and each of the five MSEL scale scores were significantly higher than chronological age-based scores at all ages. These corrected scores were significantly higher than the chronological scores regardless of gestational age whether weight was, or adequate or small for gestational age. Larger differences between corrected and chronological age-based scores significantly correlated with earlier gestational age and with lower birth weight between 1 and 24 months but not at 36 months. Using chronological age-based scores yielded significantly more infants identified with developmental delays than using corrected age-based scores. The findings indicate that clinicians and researchers, as well as family members, should be aware of and acknowledge the distinction between corrected and chronological ages when evaluating preterm infants in research and clinical practices.