False Memories and Free Speech: Is Scientific Debate Being Suppressed?. Issue 1 (14th October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Andrews, Bernice; Brewin, Chris R.
• Is Part Of: Applied cognitive psychology. Volume 31:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 45
• Page End: 49
• Publication Date: 2016-10-14
• Subjects: Cognition -- Periodicals; Psychology, Applied -- Periodicals; 153
• DOI: 10.1002/acp.3285
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0888-4080

Abstract

Summary: Commentators have raised important points, including the relative contribution of false beliefs versus false memories and the issue of how findings in the laboratory can be generalized to the real world, which we have addressed here. However, some of the commentaries misrepresent what we said, make criticisms that are unfounded, or imply that our article should not have been published in Applied Cognitive Psychology. We relate these responses to a more general literature on the suppression of unwanted scientific findings and suggest that the study of false memory would be better served by more openness to alternative perspectives. Copyright © 2016 The Authors Applied Cognitive Psychology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd