Predictive power of remote sensing versus temperature‐derived variables in modelling phenology of herbivorous insects. Issue 2 (10th August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pöyry, Juha; Böttcher, Kristin; Fronzek, Stefan; Gobron, Nadine; Leinonen, Reima; Metsämäki, Sari; Virkkala, Raimo
• Editors: Pettorelli, Nathalie; He, Kate
• Is Part Of: Remote sensing in ecology and conservation. Volume 4:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 113
• Page End: 126
• Publication Date: 2017-08-10
• Subjects: Modelling -- moths -- phenology -- remote sensing data -- spatial prediction -- thermal sum; Remote sensing -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Research -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Remote sensing -- Periodicals; Nature conservation -- Methodology -- Periodicals; 577.0723
• DOI: 10.1002/rse2.56
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2056-3485

Abstract

Abstract: Application of remote sensing datasets in modelling phenology of heterotrophic animals has received little attention. In this work, we compare the predictive power of remote sensing versus temperature‐derived variables in modelling peak flight periods of herbivorous insects, as exemplified by nocturnal moths. Moth phenology observations consisted of weekly observations of five focal moth species ( Orthosia gothica, Ectropis crepuscularia, Cabera exanthemata, Dysstroma citrata and Operophtera brumata ) gathered in a national moth monitoring scheme in Finland. These species were common and widespread and had peak flight periods in different seasons. Temperature‐derived data were represented by weekly accumulating growing degree days (GDD) calculated from gridded temperature observations. Remote sensing data were obtained from three sources: (1) snow melt‐off date from the MODIS daily snow maps, (2) greening date using the NDWI from MODIS data and (3) dates of start, maximum and end of growing season based on the JRC FAPAR products. Peak phenology observations of moths were related to different explanatory variables by using linear mixed effect models (LMM), with 70% of the data randomly selected for model calibration. Predictive power of models was tested using the remaining 30% of the data. Remote sensing data (snow melt‐off and vegetation greening date) showed the highest predictive power in two moth species flying in the early and late spring, whereas in the three other species none of the variables showed reasonable predictive power. Flight period of the spring species coincides with natural events such as snow melt or vegetation greening that can easily be observed using remote sensing techniques. We demonstrate the applicability of our methodology by predictive spatial maps of peak flight phenology covering the entire Finland for two of the focal species. The methods are applicable in situations that require spatial predictions of animal activity, such as the management of populations of insect pest species. Abstract : Remote sensing data are commonly used in monitoring vegetation phenology, but their application in modelling phenology has received little attention. Here we develop spatial predictive models of phenology for a selection of moth species differing in their flight periods. We compare predictive power of remote sensing data with temperature‐derived variables in these models, and demonstrate the feasibility of remote sensing data in spatial prediction of insect phenology. Such methods have potentially wide applicability in, for example, biodiversity conservation and management of natural resources.