Is the Newest Vital Sign a Useful Measure of Health Literacy in HIV Disease?. (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kordovski, Victoria M.; Woods, Steven Paul; Avci, Gunes; Verduzco, Marizela; Morgan, Erin E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. Volume 16:Number 6(2017:Nov./Dec.)
• Page Start: 595
• Page End: 602
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: HIV -- health literacy -- numeracy; AIDS (Disease) -- Periodicals; 616.9792
• DOI: 10.1177/2325957417729753
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2325-9574

Abstract

Background: Limited health literacy is common among persons infected with HIV and has been linked to poor mental and physical health outcomes, but there are no well-validated screening measures of health literacy in this vulnerable clinical population. The present study evaluates the usefulness of the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) as a brief measure of health literacy in HIV disease. Methods: Seventy-eight HIV+ adults were administered the NVS, Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM), and Single Item Literacy Screener (SILS). Main criterion variables included plasma HIV viral load, medication management capacity, self-efficacy for medication management, and perceived relationships with healthcare providers. Results: The NVS showed good internal consistency and moderate correlations with the REALM and SILS. Rates of limited health literacy were highest on the NVS (30.3%) as compared to SILS (6.6%) and REALM (9.2%). A series of regressions controlling for education showed that the NVS was incrementally predictive of viral load, medication management capacity and self-efficacy, and relationships with healthcare providers, above and beyond the REALM and SILS. Conclusion: The NVS shows evidence of reliability, convergent validity, and incremental criterion-related validity and thus may serve as useful screening tool for assessing health literacy in HIV disease.