Qualitative Case Study of Public Health Preparedness and Response to the Rabid Raccoon Discovered in Wise County, Virginia. (1st April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martin, Brian; Williamson, Benjamin; Nahar, Vinayak K.; Gruszynski, Karen; Sharma, Manoj; Johnson, Jason W.
• Other Names: Ortega-Pacheco Antonio Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of veterinary medicine. Volume 2019(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-04-01
• Subjects: Veterinary medicine -- Periodicals; 636.08905
• DOI: 10.1155/2019/5734590
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2356-7708

Abstract

Abstract : Rabies is a zoonotic lyssavirus of mammals that is a major public health threat due to the high mortality rate in humans who develop clinical symptoms. In the United States and other developed countries, the main reservoirs are wildlife species. In April 2017, a raccoon tested positive for rabies in Wise County, Virginia, with a second raccoon testing positive in May. Wise County, Virginia, is one of the few counties in western Virginia that is not endemic for raccoon rabies variant virus. Due to this fact, local, state, and federal agencies worked together to prevent and control the outbreak to stop the public health theat. The purpose of this study was to understand how professionals from these various agencies viewed the response efforts to the two rabid raccoons in 2017 and to determine what could be done to improve future responses. A list of responders from the different agencies involved in the outbreak in 2017 was created. Participants were recruited via email and those who agreed to be interviewed were contacted via telephone. Participants were asked a series of 13 questions pertaining to the 2017 outbreak to understand more about the strengths and weaknesses perceived during the outbreak. Of the 11 individuals contacted, six agreed to an interview. Data were analyzed utilizing a three-step qualitative analysis process which included the steps of open coding, audit trail, and axial coding. Staff and partnerships were identified as strengths of the response while funding, community, and region were identified as weaknesses of the response. It is hoped that by identifying different strengths and weaknesses through qualitative analysis this will aid in improving future responses.