Trophic plasticity among spring vs. cave populations of Gammarus minus: examining functional niches using stable isotopes and C/N ratios. Issue 4 (28th April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: MacAvoy, Stephen E.; Braciszewski, Alyssa; Tengi, Eric; Fong, Daniel W.
• Is Part Of: Ecological research. Volume 31:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 589
• Page End: 595
• Publication Date: 2016-04-28
• Subjects: Trophic plasticity -- Gammarus minus -- Stable isotopes -- Functional niches; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Japan -- Periodicals; Écologie; Japon; Ecology; Japan; Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1007/s11284-016-1359-6
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0912-3814

Abstract

Abstract: In some environments, species may exhibit trophic plasticity, which allows them to extend beyond their assigned functional group. For Gammarus minus, a freshwater amphipod classified as a shredder or detritivore, cave populations have been observed consuming heterotrophs as well as shredding leaves, and therefore may be exhibiting trophic plasticity. To test this possibility, we examined the C and N stable isotope and C/N ratios for cave and spring populations of G. minus . A 15‐day feeding experiment using leaves and G. minus from a spring population established that the diet‐tissue discrimination factor was 3.2 ‰ for δ 15 N. Cave G. minus were 8 ‰ higher in δ 15 N relative to cave leaves, indicating they did not derive nitrogen from leaves, whereas field collected spring populations were 2–3 ‰ higher than spring leaves, indicating that they did. Cave G. minus were 2.6 ‰ higher in δ 15 N than the cave isopod, Caecidotea holsingeri . Relative to spring populations, Organ Cave G. minus were 15 N enriched by 6 ‰, suggesting they occupied a different trophic level, or incorporated an isotopically distinct N source. While stable isotopes cannot tell what the cave G. minus are eating, the isotopes certainly show that G. minus are not eating leaves and are trophically distinct form the surface populations. Differences in C/N ratios were observed, but reflect the size of the G. minus examined and not feeding group or habitat. The isotope data strongly support the hypothesis that cave populations of G. minus have become generalist or omnivorous by including animal protein in their diet.