Hospital lung surgery volume and patient outcomes. (March 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Hospital lung surgery volume and patient outcomes. (March 2019)
- Main Title:
- Hospital lung surgery volume and patient outcomes
- Authors:
- Thai, A.A.
Stuart, E.
te Marvelde, L.
Milne, R.L.
Knight, S.
Whitfield, K.
Mitchell, P. - Abstract:
- Highlights: Historical data suggests an association between survival and the number of surgeries done at a hospital. In our Australian study, we found no evidence of survival differences in patients between low- and high-volume hospitals for lung cancer surgery. A higher proportion of patients had an ICU admission ≥24 h in lower volume centres. Abstract: Objectives: There has been evidence of an association between patient outcomes and the number of surgeries performed at a hospital. To our knowledge, there are no Australian data on hospital cancer surgery volumes and patient outcomes. We evaluated the relationship between hospital non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery volume and patient outcomes in Victoria. Materials and methods: Patients with a primary diagnosis of NSCLC between 2008 and 2014 were identified in the Victorian Cancer Registry (n = 15, 369), 3, 420 (22%) of whom had lung cancer surgery. Primary outcome was death within 90 days of surgery and secondary outcomes included overall survival, use of postoperative ventilation and ≥24hours spent in ICU. Hospital volume was measured as the average number of lung surgeries performed per year, with quartiles Q1: 1–17, Q2: 18–34, Q3: 35–58 and Q4: 59 + . Results: 57% (1, 941/3, 420) lung cancer patients underwent lobectomy, 38% (1, 299/3, 420) sub-lobar resection and 5% (180/3, 420) pneumonectomy. The overall 90-day mortality after lung surgery was 3.5%, and was 2.6% and 4.5% for patients undergoing lobectomy andHighlights: Historical data suggests an association between survival and the number of surgeries done at a hospital. In our Australian study, we found no evidence of survival differences in patients between low- and high-volume hospitals for lung cancer surgery. A higher proportion of patients had an ICU admission ≥24 h in lower volume centres. Abstract: Objectives: There has been evidence of an association between patient outcomes and the number of surgeries performed at a hospital. To our knowledge, there are no Australian data on hospital cancer surgery volumes and patient outcomes. We evaluated the relationship between hospital non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery volume and patient outcomes in Victoria. Materials and methods: Patients with a primary diagnosis of NSCLC between 2008 and 2014 were identified in the Victorian Cancer Registry (n = 15, 369), 3, 420 (22%) of whom had lung cancer surgery. Primary outcome was death within 90 days of surgery and secondary outcomes included overall survival, use of postoperative ventilation and ≥24hours spent in ICU. Hospital volume was measured as the average number of lung surgeries performed per year, with quartiles Q1: 1–17, Q2: 18–34, Q3: 35–58 and Q4: 59 + . Results: 57% (1, 941/3, 420) lung cancer patients underwent lobectomy, 38% (1, 299/3, 420) sub-lobar resection and 5% (180/3, 420) pneumonectomy. The overall 90-day mortality after lung surgery was 3.5%, and was 2.6% and 4.5% for patients undergoing lobectomy and sub-lobar resection respectively. There was no difference in 90-day mortality and overall survival between low- and high-volume centres regardless of procedure. Patients operated on in lower volume centres had more admissions to ICU ≥24hours (Q1. 55% vs. Q4. 11%, p-trend <0.001). A higher proportion of patients attending private hospitals (19%) had an ASA score of 4 compared with patients attending a public hospital (9%). Conclusion: We observed no evidence of survival differences between lung cancer patients attending low- and high-volume hospitals for cancer surgery. A higher proportion of patients had an ICU admission ≥24hours in lower volume centres and there are a higher proportion of patients with an ASA score of 4 in private hospitals compared to public hospitals. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lung cancer. Volume 129(2019)
- Journal:
- Lung cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 129(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 129, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 129
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0129-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 22
- Page End:
- 27
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03
- Subjects:
- Non-small cell lung cancer -- Surgery -- Outcomes -- Surgical volume -- Survival
Lungs -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Lung Neoplasms -- Abstracts
Lung Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Poumons -- Cancer -- Périodiques
Lungs -- Cancer
Periodicals
Electronic journals
Electronic journals
616.99424 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01695002 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01695002 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01695002 ↗
http://www.lungcancerjournal.info/issues ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.01.002 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0169-5002
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5307.245000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10452.xml