A conservation assessment of Canada's boreal forest incorporating alternate climate change scenarios. Issue 4 (14th December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Powers, Ryan P.; Coops, Nicholas C.; Tulloch, Vivitskaia J.; Gergel, Sarah E.; Nelson, Trisalyn A.; Wulder, Michael A.
• Editors: Nagendra, Harini; de Klerk, Helen
• Is Part Of: Remote sensing in ecology and conservation. Volume 3:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: 202
• Page End: 216
• Publication Date: 2016-12-14
• Subjects: Boreal -- climate change -- MarProb -- Marxan -- prioritization -- systematic conservation planning; Remote sensing -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Research -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Remote sensing -- Periodicals; Nature conservation -- Methodology -- Periodicals; 577.0723
• DOI: 10.1002/rse2.34
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2056-3485

Abstract

Abstract: Ecologically based strategies for climate change adaptation can be constructively integrated into a terrestrial conservation assessment for Canada's boreal forest, one of Earth's largest remaining wilderness areas. Identifying solutions that minimize variability in projected vegetation productivity may represent a less risky conservation investment by reducing the amount of anticipated environmental change. In this study, we assessed hypothetical protected area networks designed for future vegetation variability under a range of different climate conditions to provide relevant recommendations of conservation requirements that support ongoing boreal conservation and land‐use planning. We constructed a boreal conservation assessment using both a conventional (Marxan) and a new probabilistic site‐selection approach (Marxan with probability) with projected 2080 vegetation variability probability (VVP) for least change (B1), business as usual (A1B) and most extreme change (A2) climate scenarios. We then assessed (1) reserve network performance (cost and area), (2) high conservation priority areas and (3) the influence and implications of VVP on reserve networks. We found that including VVP dramatically increased the relative cost and total area of reserve networks. Many low‐cost sites with high VVP values were given higher conservation priority over fewer sites with low VVP values. Reserve networks designed for A1B and A2 climate scenarios contained more sites with very high VVP values. The ratio of sites with high and very high VVP values changes dramatically for reserve networks designed for current and least change (B1) climate scenarios when under more severe A1B and A2 conditions. We conclude that introducing additional complexity and realism into national or boreal‐wide conservation assessments, that include, for example, elements of climate change, will increase the total area and cost of a reserve network. Moreover, reserve networks designed for current or least change (B1) climate scenarios will likely not achieve conservation targets when faced with more severe conditions, and will require additional sites. The adaptive strategies presented are well suited for a boreal conservation assessment and may improve long‐term effectiveness of biodiversity conservation objectives. Abstract : This manuscript demonstrates how ecologically based strategies for climate change adaptation can be constructively integrated into a terrestrial conservation assessment for Canada's boreal forest, one of Earth's largest remaining wilderness areas. We assessed hypothetical protected area networks designed for future vegetation variability under a range of different climate conditions, to provide relevant recommendations of conservation requirements that support ongoing boreal conservation and land‐use planning. The main findings of our research are that introducing additional complexity and realism into national or boreal‐wide conservation assessments, including elements of climate change, for example, will increase the total area and cost of a reserve network, and that reserve networks designed for current or least change (B1) climate scenarios probably would not achieve conservation targets when faced with more severe conditions, and will require additional sites. The adaptive strategies presented are well suited for broad conservation assessments and may improve long‐term effectiveness of biodiversity conservation objectives.