Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty for Metastatic Spinal Lesions: A Systematic Review. Issue 5 (June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sadeghi-Naini, Mohsen; Aarabi, Shahram; Shokraneh, Farhad; Janani, Leila; Vaccaro, Alexander R.; Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa
• Is Part Of: Clinical spine surgery. Volume 31:Issue 5(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-06
• Subjects: metastatic spinal lesion -- vertebroplasty -- kyphoplasty -- systematic review -- pain -- disability -- quality of life -- meta-analysis; Spinal cord -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Spinal cord -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.56059
• DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000601
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2380-0186

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: The spine is the most common site of bone metastases. Vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) have been proposed as potential minimally invasive therapeutic options for metastatic spinal lesion (MSL) pain. However, the efficacy of VP and KP on MSL pain is currently unclear. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of VP and KP compared with each other, usual care, or other treatments on pain, disability, and quality of life following MSL. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials and prospective nonrandomized controlled clinical trials assessing VP or KP for the treatment of pain following MSL without cord compression. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL. Results: The literature search revealed 387 citations. Of these, 9 trials met all eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. In total, there were 622 patients enrolled in the trials and of them 432 were in the surgical treatment group (92 received KP, 97 received VP, 134 received VP and chemotherapy, 68 received VP and radiotherapy, and 41 received Kiva implant) and 190 were in the nonsurgical treatment group (83 received chemotherapy, 46 received radiotherapy, and 61 received other treatment). Using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation approach, pain (low-quality evidence) and functional scores (very low-quality evidence) improved more with VP plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone (pain: mean difference, −3.01; 95% confidence interval, −3.21 to −2.80; functional score: mean difference, 15.46; 95% confidence interval, 13.58–17.34). KP seemed to lead to significantly greater improvement in pain, disability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with nonsurgical management. VP plus Iodine-125 seemed to lead to significantly greater improvement in pain and disability in comparison with VP alone. VP plus radiochemotherapy resulted in better pain relief and HRQoL postoperatively in comparison with routine radiochemotherapy. There was low-quality evidence to prove that surgical treatment significantly decreases pain, and improves functional score and HRQoL following MSL in comparison with nonsurgical management. Conclusion: On the basis of the analysis of currently published trial data, it is unclear whether VP for MSL provides benefits over KP. Level of Evidence: Level 2. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.