Deciphering global gene expression and regulation strategy in Escherichia coli during carbon limitation. Issue 2 (11th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Zongjin; Pan, Qing; Xiao, Yunzhu; Fang, Xingxing; Shi, Ruoping; Fu, Chunxiang; Danchin, Antoine; You, Conghui
• Is Part Of: Microbial biotechnology. Volume 12:Issue 2(2019:Mar.)
• Page Start: 360
• Page End: 376
• Publication Date: 2018-12-11
• Subjects: Microbial biotechnology -- Periodicals; Biotechnology; Microbiology; 660.62
• DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13343
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-7915

Abstract

Summary: Despite decades of studies meant to analyse the bacterial response to carbon limitation, we still miss a high‐resolution overview of the situation. All gene expression changes observed in such conditions cannot solely be accounted for by the global regulator Crp either free or bound to its effector, cyclic AMP. Here, for the first time, we evaluated the response of both CDS (protein‐coding sequence) and ncRNA (non‐coding RNA) genes to carbon limitation, revealed cellular functions of differentially expressed genes systematically, quantified the contribution of Crp‐cAMP and other factors to regulation and deciphered regulation strategies at a genomewide scale. Approximately one‐third of the differentially expressed genes we identified responded to Crp‐cAMP via its direct or indirect control, while the remaining genes were subject to growth rate‐dependent control or were controlled by other regulators, especially RpoS. Importantly, gene regulation mechanisms can be established by expression pattern studies. Here, we propose a comprehensive picture of how cells respond to carbon scarcity. The global regulation strategies thus exposed illustrate that the response of cell to carbon scarcity is not limited to maintaining sufficient carbon metabolism via cAMP signalling while the main response is to adjust metabolism to cope with a slow growth rate. Abstract : Despite decades of studies meant to analyze the bacterial response to carbon limitation we still miss a high resolution overview of the situation. Here, for the first time, we evaluated the response of both CDS (protein‐coding sequence) and ncRNA (non‐coding RNA) genes to carbon limitation, revealed cellular functions of differentially expressed genes systematically, quantified the contribution of Crp‐cAMP and other factors to regulation and deciphered regulation strategies at a genomewide scale. The global regulation strategies thus exposed illustrate that the response of cell to carbon scarcity is not limited to maintaining sufficient carbon metabolism via cAMP signaling while the main response is to adjust metabolism to cope with a slow growth rate.