Non-contact structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge: case study. Issue 8 (3rd August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alamdari, Mehrisadat Makki; Ge, Linlin; Kildashti, Kamyar; Zhou, Yincai; Harvey, Bruce; Du, Zheyuan
• Is Part Of: Structure and infrastructure engineering. Volume 15:Issue 8(2019)
• Page Start: 1119
• Page End: 1136
• Publication Date: 2019-08-03
• Subjects: Bridge health monitoring -- measurement -- non-contact sensing -- cable-stayed bridge -- influence line -- displacement -- finite element -- natural frequency; Structural analysis (Engineering) -- Periodicals; Structural engineering -- Periodicals; Buildings -- Performance -- Periodicals; 620.005
• DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2019.1609529
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1573-2479

Abstract

Abstract: In this article, the condition assessment of a cable-stayed bridge using remote sensing is presented. The displacement influence line (DIL) of the bridge under the live load tests is measured for a discrete number of target points. Three different remote sensing techniques including, laser scanning, terrestrial robotic total station and digital levelling are adopted for this purpose. It is demonstrated that DIL obtained by non-contact system is capable of identifying an emulated damage in an actual operating system. The contribution of the work is fourfold. First, a damage index based on the displacement profile of the bridge under the weigh-in-motion is extracted from the non-contact sensing system. Second, our study compares three different remote sensing techniques, namely, digital levelling, robotic total station and laser scanning and uses the measurements to validate the finite element model. Third, the effectiveness of the proposed method for structural damage identification is validated in a real-world large-scale operating structure. Finally, it is validated that strain-based influence line is highly likely to misidentify damage especially when the location of damage is not in the close proximity of the sensor; however, DIL is a better damage indicator even if damage occurs far from the measurement point.