A randomised phase II clinical trial of nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin compared with gemcitabine and carboplatin as first-line therapy in advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma (C-TONG1002). (March 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A randomised phase II clinical trial of nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin compared with gemcitabine and carboplatin as first-line therapy in advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma (C-TONG1002). (March 2019)
- Main Title:
- A randomised phase II clinical trial of nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin compared with gemcitabine and carboplatin as first-line therapy in advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma (C-TONG1002)
- Authors:
- Wang, Zhen
Huang, Cheng
Yang, Jin-Ji
Song, Yong
Cheng, Ying
Chen, Gong-Yan
Yan, Hong-Hong
Ben, Xiao-Song
Wang, Bin-Chao
Xu, Chong-Rui
Jiang, Ben-Yuan
Zhou, Qing
Chen, Hua-Jun
Wu, Yi-Long - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: N ab -paclitaxel/carboplatin ( nab -PC) and gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) are the standard first-line chemotherapy in non–small cell lung carcinoma. Up to now, there is no head to head trial to compare nab -PC with GC in advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma. Patients and methods: A multicentre randomised phase II trial was performed to compare the efficacy and safety for nab -PC with GC in previously untreated patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment-related adverse events and quality of life (QoL) were also analysed. Results: Totally 127 participants were eligible for this study (62/65 nab -PC/GC). N ab -PC has higher ORR than GC without statistical significance (42% versus 27%, P > 0.05). After a median follow-up of 14.5 months, both PFS and OS had no difference between the two arms (6.7 versus 5.8 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, P = 0.143; 11.6 versus 14.4 months, HR 0.92, P = 0.846). Both regimens were well tolerated; however, more dose reduction occurred after cycle 2 in GC (27%) than in nab -PC (12%) ( P < 0.05). Significant QoL improvement measured by trial outcome index was seen in nab -PC than in GC ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: The first-line nab -PC and GC had the same response, PFS, and OS in patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma. N ab -PCM has advantage over GC in QoL improvement. TrialAbstract: Background: N ab -paclitaxel/carboplatin ( nab -PC) and gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) are the standard first-line chemotherapy in non–small cell lung carcinoma. Up to now, there is no head to head trial to compare nab -PC with GC in advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma. Patients and methods: A multicentre randomised phase II trial was performed to compare the efficacy and safety for nab -PC with GC in previously untreated patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment-related adverse events and quality of life (QoL) were also analysed. Results: Totally 127 participants were eligible for this study (62/65 nab -PC/GC). N ab -PC has higher ORR than GC without statistical significance (42% versus 27%, P > 0.05). After a median follow-up of 14.5 months, both PFS and OS had no difference between the two arms (6.7 versus 5.8 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, P = 0.143; 11.6 versus 14.4 months, HR 0.92, P = 0.846). Both regimens were well tolerated; however, more dose reduction occurred after cycle 2 in GC (27%) than in nab -PC (12%) ( P < 0.05). Significant QoL improvement measured by trial outcome index was seen in nab -PC than in GC ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: The first-line nab -PC and GC had the same response, PFS, and OS in patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma. N ab -PCM has advantage over GC in QoL improvement. Trial registration number: NCT01236716. Highlights: N ab -paclitaxel/carboplatin and gemcitabine/carboplatin had the same efficacy in advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma. Both progression-free survival and overall survival had no difference between the two arms. Both nab -PC and GC are well tolerated. N ab -PC had advantage of improving quality of life. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of cancer. Volume 109(2019)
- Journal:
- European journal of cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 109(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0109-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 183
- Page End:
- 191
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03
- Subjects:
- 130-Nm albumin-bound paclitaxel -- Gemcitabine -- Carcinoma -- Squamous cell
Cancer -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Périodiques
Cancer
Tumors
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09598049 ↗
http://rzblx1.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/warpto.phtml?colors=7&jour_id=2879 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.01.007 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-8049
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.725100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10420.xml