Racism Is Not a Factor in Door‐to‐electrocardiogram Times of Patients With Symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective, Observational Study. (21st October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mackay, Martha H.; Ratner, Pamela A.; Veenstra, Gerry; Scheuermeyer, Frank X.; Grubisic, Maja; Ramanathan, Krishnan; Murray, Craig; Humphries, Karin H.
• Editors: Diercks, Deborah B.
• Is Part Of: Academic emergency medicine. Volume 26:Number 5(2019)
• Page Start: 491
• Page End: 500
• Publication Date: 2018-10-21
• Subjects: Emergency medicine -- Periodicals; 616.02505
• DOI: 10.1111/acem.13569
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1069-6563

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Investigators have identified important racial identity/ethnicity‐based differences in some aspects of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care and outcomes (time to presentation, symptoms, receipt of coronary angiography/revascularization, repeat revascularization, mortality). Patient‐based differences such as pathophysiology and treatment‐seeking behavior account only partly for these outcome differences. We sought to investigate whether there are racial identity/ethnicity‐based variations in the initial emergency department (ED) triage and care of patients with suspected ACS in Canadian hospitals. Methods: We prospectively enrolled ED patients with suspected ACS from one university‐affiliated and two community hospitals. Trained research assistants administered a standardized interview to gather data on symptoms, treatment‐seeking patterns, and self‐reported racial/ethnic identity: "white, " South Asian" (SA), "Asian, " or "Other." Clinical parameters were obtained through chart review. The primary outcome was door‐to‐electrocardiogram (D2ECG) time. ECG times were log‐transformed and two linear regression models, controlling for important demographic, system, and clinical factors, were fit. Results: Of 448 participants, 214 (48%) reported white identity, 115 (26%) SA, 83 (19%) Asian, and 36 (8%) "Other." Asian respondents were younger and more likely to report initial discomfort as "low" and be accompanied by family; respondents identifying as "Other" were more likely to report initial discomfort as "high." There was no difference in D2ECG time between white participants and all other groups, but there were statistically significant differences by sex: women had longer D2ECG times than men. Exploring more specific racial identities revealed similar findings: no significant differences between the white, SA, Asian, and other groups, while sex (women had 13.4% [95% confidence interval, 0.81%–27.57%] longer D2ECG times) remained statistically significantly different in the adjusted models. Conclusion: Although racial/ethnicity‐based differences in aspects of ACS care have been previously identified, we found no differences in the current study of early ED care in a Canadian urban setting. However, female patients experience longer D2ECG times, and this may be a target for process improvements.