The number and ratio of positive lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors for patients with major salivary gland cancer: Results from the surveillance, epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Issue 6 (June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Qian, Kai; Sun, Wenyu; Guo, Kai; Zheng, Xiaoke; Sun, Tuanqi; Chen, Lili; Xiang, Jun; Li, Duanshu; Wu, Yi; Ji, Qinghai; Wang, Zhuoying
• Is Part Of: European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 45:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: 1025
• Page End: 1032
• Publication Date: 2019-06
• Subjects: Major salivary gland cancer -- Lymph node metastasis -- Positive lymph node number -- Positive lymph node ratio -- Prognosis -- SEER database; Oncology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Medical Oncology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Oncologie; Chirurgie (geneeskunde); Electronic journals; Electronic journals -- Sciences; Electronic journals -- Medicine; Electronic journals; 616.994059005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0748-7983

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: To investigate whether the positive lymph node number (PLNN) and positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) could predict the prognosis of patients with major salivary gland cancer (MSGC) and to identify the optimal cutoff points for these variables that stratify patients according to their risk of survival. Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify all patients with MSGC between 1988 and 2014. A logistic regression analysis was carried out to evaluate the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in MSGC. The X-tile program was used to identify the cutoff values for the PLNN and PLNR in MSGC patients with LNM. Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to identify the predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results: In the SEER database, 8668 eligible patients were identified and 3046 of them had LNM. The logistic regression analysis indicated that older age, male sex, larger tumor size, higher grade, tumor extension and high-risk pathology were associated with LNM. The X-tile program showed that a PLNN>4 and a PLNR>0.15 were prognostic indicators of CSS. A multivariable analysis indicated that, after the factors that might potentially affect the prognosis were adjusted for, the PLNN and PLNR were still associated with CSS. Conclusions: Our Results demonstrated that the PLNN and PLNR were independent prognostic indicators for MSGC patients with lymph node metastasis.