Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial. (20th December 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial. (20th December 2015)
- Main Title:
- Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial
- Authors:
- Johansson, Tim
Keller, Sophie
Winkler, Henrike
Ostermann, Thomas
Weitgasser, Raimund
Sönnichsen, Andreas C. - Other Names:
- Pop-Busui Rodica Academic Editor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract : Aim . Testing the effectiveness of peer support additionally to a disease management programme (DMP) for type 2 diabetes patients. Methods . Unblinded cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 49 general practices, province of Salzburg, Austria. All patients enrolled in the DMP were eligible, n = 337 participated (intervention: 148 in 19 clusters; control: 189 in 20 clusters). The peer support intervention ran over 24 months and consisted of peer supporter recruitment and training, and group meetings weekly for physical exercise and monthly for discussion of diabetes related topics. Results . At two-year follow-up, adjusted analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference inHbA 1c change of 0.14% (21.97 mmol/mol) in favour of the intervention (95% CI −0.08 to 0.36%, p = 0.22 ). Baseline values were 7.02 ± 1.25% in the intervention and 7.08 ± 1.25 in the control group. None of the secondary outcome measures showed significant differences except for improved quality of life (EQ-5D-VAS) in controls (4.3 points on a scale of 100; 95% CI 0.08 to 8.53, p = 0.046 ) compared to the intervention group. Conclusion . Our peer support intervention as an additional DMP component showed no significant effect onHbA 1c and secondary outcome measures. Further RTCs with a longer follow-up are needed to reveal whether peer support will have clinically relevant effects. Trial Registration . This trial has been registered with Current Controlled Trials Ltd. (ISRCTN10291077 ).
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of diabetes research. Volume 2016(2016)
- Journal:
- Journal of diabetes research
- Issue:
- Volume 2016(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2016, Issue 2016 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 2016
- Issue:
- 2016
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-2016-2016-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-12-20
- Subjects:
- Diabetes -- Periodicals
Diabetes -- Pathophysiology -- Periodicals
Diabetes -- Prevention -- Periodicals
Diabetes -- Etiology -- Periodicals
Diabetes -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals
Diabetes -- Pathogenesis -- Periodicals
616.462005 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jdr/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1155/2016/3248547 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2314-6745
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 10345.xml