Efficient statistical inference for a parallel study with missing data by using an exact method. Issue 3 (4th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shan, Guogen; Hutson, Alan; Wilding, Gregory E; Ma, Changxing; Tian, Guo-Liang
• Is Part Of: Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics. Volume 29:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 478
• Page End: 490
• Publication Date: 2019-05-04
• Subjects: Data generating mechanism -- exact test -- one-sided test -- parallel study -- unconditional test; Pharmacy -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; Drugs -- Testing -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; Biometry -- Periodicals; Biopharmaceutics -- Periodicals; Pharmacokinetics -- Periodicals; 615.19
• DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1605782
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1054-3406

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In a parallel group study comparing a new treatment with a standard of care, missing data often occur for various reasons. When the outcome is binary, the data from such studies can be summarized into a 2 × 3 contingency table, with the missing observations in the last column. When the missingness is neither related to the outcome of interest nor related to other outcomes from the study but it is covariate dependent with the sole covariate being treatment, this type of missing data mechanism is considered as missing at random. In 2016, Tian et al. proposed three statistics to test the hypothesis that the response rate is equivalent for a parallel group study with missing data. The asymptotic limiting distributions of these test statistics were used for statistical inference. However, asymptotic approaches for testing proportions generally do not have satisfactory performance with regard to type I error rate control for a clinical trial with the sample size from small to medium. For this reason, we consider an exact approach based on maximization to provide valid and efficient statistical inference for a parallel group study with missing data. Exact approaches can guarantee the type I error rate and they are computationally feasible in this setting. We conduct extensive numerical studies to compare the performance of the exact approach based on the three statistics for a one-sided hypothesis testing problem. We conclude that the exact approach based on the likelihood ratio statistic is more powerful than the exact approach based on the other two statistics. Two real clinical trial data sets are used to illustrate the application of the proposed exact approach.