Development and External Validation of Web-Based Models to Predict the Prognosis of Remnant Gastric Cancer after Surgery: A Multicenter Study. (10th April 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Development and External Validation of Web-Based Models to Predict the Prognosis of Remnant Gastric Cancer after Surgery: A Multicenter Study. (10th April 2019)
- Main Title:
- Development and External Validation of Web-Based Models to Predict the Prognosis of Remnant Gastric Cancer after Surgery: A Multicenter Study
- Authors:
- Chen, Qi-Yue
Zhong, Qing
Zhou, Jun-Feng
Qiu, Xian-Tu
Dang, Xue-Yi
Cai, Li-Sheng
Su, Guo-Qiang
Xu, Dong-Bo
Liu, Zhi-Yu
Li, Ping
Guo, Kai-Qing
Xie, Jian-Wei
Chen, Qiu-Xian
Wang, Jia-Bin
Li, Teng-Wen
Lin, Jian-Xian
Lin, Shuang-Ming
Lu, Jun
Cao, Long-Long
Lin, Mi
Tu, Ru-Hong
Huang, Ze-Ning
Lin, Ju-Li
Lin, Wei
He, Qing-Liang
Zheng, Chao-Hui
Huang, Chang-Ming - Other Names:
- Cascinu Stefano Academic Editor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract : Background . Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is a rare malignant tumor with poor prognosis. There is no universally accepted prognostic model for RGC. Methods . We analyzed data for 253 RGC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy from 6 centers. The prognosis prediction performances of the AJCC7th and AJCC8th TNM staging systems and the TRM staging system for RGC patients were evaluated. Web-based prediction models based on independent prognostic factors were developed to predict the survival of the RGC patients. External validation was performed using a cohort of 49 Chinese patients. Results . The predictive abilities of the AJCC8th and TRM staging systems were no better than those of the AJCC7th staging system (c-index: AJCC7th vs. AJCC8th vs. TRM, 0.743 vs. 0.732 vs. 0.744; P>0.05). Within each staging system, the survival of the two adjacent stages was not well discriminated (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that age, tumor size, T stage, and N stage were independent prognostic factors. Based on the above variables, we developed 3 web-based prediction models, which were superior to the AJCC7th staging system in their discriminatory ability (c-index), predictive homogeneity (likelihood ratio chi-square), predictive accuracy (AIC, BIC), and model stability (time-dependent ROC curves). External validation showed predictable accuracies of 0.780, 0.822, and 0.700, respectively, in predicting overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-freeAbstract : Background . Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is a rare malignant tumor with poor prognosis. There is no universally accepted prognostic model for RGC. Methods . We analyzed data for 253 RGC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy from 6 centers. The prognosis prediction performances of the AJCC7th and AJCC8th TNM staging systems and the TRM staging system for RGC patients were evaluated. Web-based prediction models based on independent prognostic factors were developed to predict the survival of the RGC patients. External validation was performed using a cohort of 49 Chinese patients. Results . The predictive abilities of the AJCC8th and TRM staging systems were no better than those of the AJCC7th staging system (c-index: AJCC7th vs. AJCC8th vs. TRM, 0.743 vs. 0.732 vs. 0.744; P>0.05). Within each staging system, the survival of the two adjacent stages was not well discriminated (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that age, tumor size, T stage, and N stage were independent prognostic factors. Based on the above variables, we developed 3 web-based prediction models, which were superior to the AJCC7th staging system in their discriminatory ability (c-index), predictive homogeneity (likelihood ratio chi-square), predictive accuracy (AIC, BIC), and model stability (time-dependent ROC curves). External validation showed predictable accuracies of 0.780, 0.822, and 0.700, respectively, in predicting overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival. Conclusions . The AJCC TNM staging system and the TRM staging system did not enable good distinction among the RGC patients. We have developed and validated visual web-based prediction models that are superior to these staging systems. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of oncology. Volume 2019(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 2019(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2019, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 2019
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-2019-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-04-10
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Research -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
Neoplasms
Oncology -- Research
Tumors
Periodicals
Periodicals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jo/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=859&action=archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1155/2019/6012826 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1687-8450
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 10251.xml