Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers. Issue 1 (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Politi, Mary; Estlund, Amy; Milne, Anne; Buckel, Christina; Peipert, Jeffrey; Madden, Tessa
• Is Part Of: Contraception and reproductive medicine. Volume 1:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 9
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Contraception -- Qualitative research methods -- Providers -- Quality of care; Contraceptives -- Periodicals; Contraception -- Periodicals; Reproductive health -- Periodicals; 613.9405
• DOI: 10.1186/s40834-016-0032-3
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2055-7426

Abstract

Abstract Background The Contraceptive CHOICE Project developed a patient-centered model for contraceptive provision including: (1) structured, evidence-based counseling; (2) staff and health care provider education; and (3) removal of barriers such as cost and multiple appointments to initiate contraception. In preparation for conducting a research study of the CHOICE model in three community health settings, we sought to identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementation. Methods Using a semi-structured interview guide guided by a framework of implementation research, we conducted 31 qualitative interviews with female patients, staff, and health care providers assessing attitudes, beliefs, and barriers to receiving contraception. We also asked about current contraceptive provision and explored organizational practices relevant to implementing the CHOICE model. We used a grounded theory approach to identify major themes. Results Many participants felt that current contraceptive provision could be improved by the CHOICE model. Potential facilitators included agreement about the necessity for improved contraceptive knowledge among patients and staff; importance of patient-centered contraceptive counseling; and benefits to same-day insertion of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Potential barriers included misconceptions about contraception held by staff and providers; resistance to new practices; costs associated with LARC; and scheduling challenges required for same-day insertion of LARC. Conclusions In addition to staff and provider training, implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision needs to be supplemented by strategies to manage patient and system-level barriers. Community health center staff, providers, and patients support patient-centered contraceptive counseling to improve contraception provision if organizations can address these barriers.