Genomic alterations in neuroendocrine cancers of the ovary. Issue 1 (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yaghmour, George; Prouet, Philippe; Wiedower, Eric; Jamy, Omer; Feldman, Rebecca; Chandler, Jason; Pandey, Manjari; Martin, Mike
• Is Part Of: Journal of ovarian research. Volume 9:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 5
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Gynecologic malignancies -- Small cell carcinoma of ovary -- Genomic profiling -- Actionable mutation -- Chemotherapy; Ovaries -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Ovaries -- Periodicals; 618.11
• DOI: 10.1186/s13048-016-0259-2
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1757-2215

Abstract

Abstract Background As we have previously reported, small cell carcinoma of the ovary (SCCO) is a rare, aggressive form of ovarian cancer associated with poor outcomes. In an effort to identify new treatment options, we utilized comprehensive genomic profiling to assess the potential for novel therapies in SCCO. Methods Patients with SCCO, SCCO-HT (hypercalcemic type), neuroendocrine tumors of the ovary (NET-O), and small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCLC) profiled by Caris Life Sciences between 2007–2015 were identified. Tumors were assessed with up to 21 IHC stains, in situ hybridization of cMET, EGFR, HER2 and PIK3CA, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) as well as Sanger sequencing of selected genes. Results Forty-six patients with SCCO (10 SCCO, 18 SCCO-HT, 18 NET-O) were identified as well as 58 patients with SCLC for comparison. Patients with SCCO and SCCO-HT were younger (median 42 years [range 12–75] and 26 years [range 8–40], respectively) than patients with NET-O 62 [range 13–76] or SCLC 66 [range 36–86]. SCCO patients were more likely to be metastatic (70 %) than SCCO-HT (50 %) or NET-O (33 %) patients, but at a similar rate to SCLC patients (65 %). PD1 expression varied across tumor type with SCCO (100 %), SCCO-HT (60 %), NET-O (33 %) vs SCLC (42 %). PDL1 expression also varied with SCCO (50 %), SCCO-HT (20 %), NET-O (33 %) and SCLC (0 %). No amplifications were identified in cMET, EGFR, or HER2 and only 1 was found in PIK3CA (NET-O). Actionable mutations were rare with 1 patient with SCCO having a BRCA2 mutation and 1 patient with NET-O having a PIK3CA mutation. No other actionable mutations were identified. Conclusions No recurrent actionable mutations or rearrangements were identified using this platform in SCCO. IHC patterns may help guide the use of chemotherapy in these rare tumors.