Experiences of a High‐Risk Population with Prenatal Hemoglobinopathy Carrier Screening in a Primary Care Setting: a Qualitative Study. Issue 3 (5th October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Holtkamp, Kim C. A.; Lakeman, Phillis; Hader, Hind; Jans, Suze M. J. P.; Hoenderdos, Maria; Playfair, Henna A. M.; Cornel, Martina C.; Peters, Marjolein; Henneman, Lidewij
• Is Part Of: Journal of genetic counseling. Volume 27:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 635
• Page End: 646
• Publication Date: 2017-10-05
• Subjects: Hemoglobinopathies -- Sickle cell disease -- Thalassemia -- Carrier screening -- Midwives -- Primary care -- Prenatal testing -- Qualitative research; Genetic counseling -- Periodicals; 616.042
• DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0159-7
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1059-7700

Abstract

Abstract: Carrier screening for hemoglobinopathies (HbPs; sickle cell disease and thalassemia) aims to facilitate autonomous reproductive decision‐making. In the absence of a Dutch national HbP carrier screening program, some primary care midwives offer screening on an ad hoc basis. This qualitative descriptive study explores how pregnant women perceive an offer of HbP carrier screening by their midwife. Semi‐structured interviews ( n = 26) were conducted with pregnant women at risk of being a HbP carrier, and whom were offered screening at their booking appointment in one of two midwifery practices in Amsterdam. The results showed that half of the respondents were familiar with HbPs. Generally, women perceived the offer of HbP carrier screening as positive, and most women ( n = 19) accepted screening. Seven declined, of whom two already knew their carrier status. Important reasons to accept screening were to obtain knowledge about their own carrier status and health of their unborn child, and the ease of the procedure. A multistep process of decision‐making was observed, as many women did not give follow‐up testing (e.g. partner, invasive diagnostics) much consideration while deciding on accepting or declining HbP screening. Women experienced information overload, and preferred receiving the information at a different moment (e.g. before the intake by a leaflet, or preconceptionally). In conclusion, while prenatal HbP carrier screening is perceived as positive, informed decision‐making seems to be suboptimal, and both the content and timing of the information provided needs improvement.