Physiological strain and decision making affected by different cooling tactics following live‐fire training. Issue 2 (9th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hemmatjo, Rasoul; Zare, Sajad; Hajaghazadeh, Mohammad; Allahyari, Teimour; Kazemi, Reza
• Is Part Of: Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing and service industries. Volume 29:Issue 2(2019)
• Page Start: 118
• Page End: 125
• Publication Date: 2018-09-09
• Subjects: decision making -- firefighter -- Iowa gambling task -- live‐fire -- physiological response; Computer integrated manufacturing systems -- Periodicals; Human engineering -- Periodicals; 620.8205
• DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20763
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1090-8471

Abstract

Abstract: Multiple factors, including different environmental, physical, and psychophysiological agents, influence firefighters' health and safety in real fire and rescue operations. This experimental study investigated the effect of live‐fire training and cooling strategies on both physiological response and decision making. Twenty‐three healthy male firefighters performed live‐fire tasks in four separate conditions: namely rest or without cooling method (WCM), cool vest (CV), forearm immersion (FI), and cool vest and forearm immersion (CV + FI). Cooling effects of the employed interventions were evaluated based on heart rate (HR), tympanic temperature (TT), and Iowa gambling task (IGT) scores. At the end of the four experimental conditions, HR and TT increased, whereas IGT scores as a measure of decision making decreased relative to baseline. HR (beats per minute) and TT (°C) were significantly lower at the end of the experiment in the CV, FI, and CV + FI compared with the WCM conditions. There was no significant difference in Iowa scores between experimental conditions. These consequences demonstrate that live‐fire tasks are effective in raising the physiological and decision‐making responses following firefighting activities. It is concluded that CV, FI, and CV + FI were more effective than the WCM in attenuating physiological responses and decision making during live‐fire training.