Assessing UV Inactivation of Adenovirus 41 Using Integrated Cell Culture Real‐Time qPCR/RT‐qPCR. (1st April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ding, Ning; Craik, Stephen A.; Pang, Xiaoli; Lee, Bonita; Neumann, Norman F.
• Is Part Of: Water environment research. Volume 89:Number 4(2017)
• Page Start: 323
• Page End: 329
• Publication Date: 2017-04-01
• Subjects: adenovirus type 41 -- real‐time quantitative PCR/RT‐PCR -- cell culture -- cytopathic effects -- UV inactivation -- water; Water quality management -- Periodicals; Water -- Purification -- Periodicals; Water -- Pollution -- Periodicals; Water -- Pollution; Water -- Purification; Water quality management; Sewage; Water Pollution; Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 628.16
• DOI: 10.2175/106143017X14839994523028
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1061-4303

Abstract

Abstract : Enteric adenoviruses are among most UV‐resistant viruses in water. Cytopathic effects (CPE)‐based cell culture TCID50 assay as a conventional virus assessment approach has major drawbacks for enteric adenovirus since it is selective on cell lines and takes longer time to show CPE. Integrated cell culture real‐time quantitative PCR (ICC‐qPCR) and reverse transcriptase (RT)‐qPCR were applied in this study, in comparison with TCID50, to assess UV inactivation of adenovirus type 41 (Ad41) in water. Adenovirus type 41 was exposed to UV doses of 40, 80, 160, and 320 mJ/cm 2 using a collimated beam apparatus. There was no significant difference of inactivation at conducted UV doses between measurements using TCID50 assay and ICC‐RT‐qPCR. Both assays fitted the Chick‐Watson model at 95% confidence level. The inactivation measured by ICC‐qPCR did not fit the Chick‐Watson model. In summary, ICC‐RT‐qPCR is the most appropriate alternate to CPE‐based assay for assessing UV inactivation of enteric adenoviruses.