Spatial capture–recapture models allowing Markovian transience or dispersal. Issue 1 (21st November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Royle, J. Andrew; Fuller, Angela K.; Sutherland, Chris
• Is Part Of: Population ecology. Volume 58:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 53
• Page End: 62
• Publication Date: 2015-11-21
• Subjects: Animal movement -- Density estimation -- Dispersal -- Spatial capture–recapture -- Spatially explicit capture–recapture -- Transience; Animal populations -- Periodicals; Insect populations -- Periodicals; 591.788
• DOI: 10.1007/s10144-015-0524-z
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1438-3896

Abstract

Abstract: Spatial capture–recapture (SCR) models are a relatively recent development in quantitative ecology, and they are becoming widely used to model density in studies of animal populations using camera traps, DNA sampling and other methods which produce spatially explicit individual encounter information. One of the core assumptions of SCR models is that individuals possess home ranges that are spatially stationary during the sampling period. For many species, this assumption is unlikely to be met and, even for species that are typically territorial, individuals may disperse or exhibit transience at some life stages. In this paper we first conduct a simulation study to evaluate the robustness of estimators of density under ordinary SCR models when dispersal or transience is present in the population. Then, using both simulated and real data, we demonstrate that such models can easily be described in the BUGS language providing a practical framework for their analysis, which allows us to evaluate movement dynamics of species using capture–recapture data. We find that while estimators of density are extremely robust, even to pathological levels of movement (e.g., complete transience), the estimator of the spatial scale parameter of the encounter probability model is confounded with the dispersal/transience scale parameter. Thus, use of ordinary SCR models to make inferences about density is feasible, but interpretation of SCR model parameters in relation to movement should be avoided. Instead, when movement dynamics are of interest, such dynamics should be parameterized explicitly in the model.