Accuracy of self-reported weight in the Women's Health Initiative. Issue 6 (19th November 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Accuracy of self-reported weight in the Women's Health Initiative. Issue 6 (19th November 2018)
- Main Title:
- Accuracy of self-reported weight in the Women's Health Initiative
- Authors:
- Luo, Juhua
Thomson, Cynthia A
Hendryx, Michael
Tinker, Lesley F
Manson, JoAnn E
Li, Yueyao
Nelson, Dorothy A
Vitolins, Mara Z
Seguin, Rebecca A
Eaton, Charles B
Wactawski-Wende, Jean
Margolis, Karen L - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To assess the extent of error present in self-reported weight data in the Women's Health Initiative, variables that may be associated with error, and to develop methods to reduce any identified error. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Forty clinical centres in the USA. Participants: Women ( n 75 336) participating in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS) and women ( n 6236) participating in the WHI Long Life Study (LLS) with self-reported and measured weight collected about 20 years later (2013–2014). Results: The correlation between self-reported and measured weights was 0·97. On average, women under-reported their weight by about 2 lb (0·91 kg). The discrepancies varied by age, race/ethnicity, education and BMI. Compared with normal-weight women, underweight women over-reported their weight by 3·86 lb (1·75 kg) and obese women under-reported their weight by 4·18 lb (1·90 kg) on average. The higher the degree of excess weight, the greater the under-reporting of weight. Adjusting self-reported weight for an individual's age, race/ethnicity and education yielded an identical average weight to that measured. Conclusions: Correlations between self-reported and measured weights in the WHI are high. Discrepancies varied by different sociodemographic characteristics, especially an individual's BMI. Correction of self-reported weight for individual characteristics could improve the accuracy of assessment of obesity status inAbstract: Objective: To assess the extent of error present in self-reported weight data in the Women's Health Initiative, variables that may be associated with error, and to develop methods to reduce any identified error. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Forty clinical centres in the USA. Participants: Women ( n 75 336) participating in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS) and women ( n 6236) participating in the WHI Long Life Study (LLS) with self-reported and measured weight collected about 20 years later (2013–2014). Results: The correlation between self-reported and measured weights was 0·97. On average, women under-reported their weight by about 2 lb (0·91 kg). The discrepancies varied by age, race/ethnicity, education and BMI. Compared with normal-weight women, underweight women over-reported their weight by 3·86 lb (1·75 kg) and obese women under-reported their weight by 4·18 lb (1·90 kg) on average. The higher the degree of excess weight, the greater the under-reporting of weight. Adjusting self-reported weight for an individual's age, race/ethnicity and education yielded an identical average weight to that measured. Conclusions: Correlations between self-reported and measured weights in the WHI are high. Discrepancies varied by different sociodemographic characteristics, especially an individual's BMI. Correction of self-reported weight for individual characteristics could improve the accuracy of assessment of obesity status in postmenopausal women. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Public health nutrition. Volume 22:Issue 6(2019)
- Journal:
- Public health nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Issue 6(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 6 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0022-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 1019
- Page End:
- 1028
- Publication Date:
- 2018-11-19
- Subjects:
- Accuracy, -- Validation, -- Self-reported weight, -- Measured weight
Nutrition -- Periodicals
Nutrition policy -- Periodicals
Public health -- Periodicals
613.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PHN ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1017/S1368980018003002 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1368-9800
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library STI - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 10162.xml