Benefit of directional microphones for unilateral, bilateral and bimodal cochlear implant users. (4th May 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Benefit of directional microphones for unilateral, bilateral and bimodal cochlear implant users. (4th May 2019)
- Main Title:
- Benefit of directional microphones for unilateral, bilateral and bimodal cochlear implant users
- Authors:
- Ernst, Arneborg
Anton, Kristina
Brendel, Martina
Battmer, Rolf-Dieter - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To compare the standard T-Mic setting to UltraZoom and StereoZoom in 10 unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users, 10 bimodal device users and 10 bilateral CI users as well as a normal hearing (NH) reference group ( n = 10). Method: Speech reception thresholds were measured using the Oldenburg sentence test in noise. Speech was presented from the front at 0°, noise was presented from five loudspeakers spaced at ±60°, ±120°, 180° (setup A) or from four loudspeakers in the front hemisphere at ±30°, ±60° and one at 180° (setup B). Results: There was a significant advantage for UltraZoom and StereoZoom for all groups in both setups. The largest advantage was for StereoZoom in the bilateral group (setup A, 5.2 dB, P < 0.001 and B, 3.4 dB, P < 0.001) There was a significant advantage for StereoZoom over UltraZoom in the bimodal group (setup A, P < 0.01 and B, P < 0.05) and in the bilateral group ( P < 0.01, setup B only). The bilateral group performed as well as the normally hearing group in both setups and the bimodal group performed as well in setup A. There was a significant benefit of 1.8 dB for ClearVoice over UltraZoom alone for the unilateral group. Conclusions: UltraZoom and StereoZoom provided a clinically and statistically significant benefit over the T-Mic condition. The largest gain was shown for StereoZoom in the bimodal and bilateral groups. The use of StereoZoom enabled the bilateral group to perform as well as the normally hearing group inAbstract : Objective: To compare the standard T-Mic setting to UltraZoom and StereoZoom in 10 unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users, 10 bimodal device users and 10 bilateral CI users as well as a normal hearing (NH) reference group ( n = 10). Method: Speech reception thresholds were measured using the Oldenburg sentence test in noise. Speech was presented from the front at 0°, noise was presented from five loudspeakers spaced at ±60°, ±120°, 180° (setup A) or from four loudspeakers in the front hemisphere at ±30°, ±60° and one at 180° (setup B). Results: There was a significant advantage for UltraZoom and StereoZoom for all groups in both setups. The largest advantage was for StereoZoom in the bilateral group (setup A, 5.2 dB, P < 0.001 and B, 3.4 dB, P < 0.001) There was a significant advantage for StereoZoom over UltraZoom in the bimodal group (setup A, P < 0.01 and B, P < 0.05) and in the bilateral group ( P < 0.01, setup B only). The bilateral group performed as well as the normally hearing group in both setups and the bimodal group performed as well in setup A. There was a significant benefit of 1.8 dB for ClearVoice over UltraZoom alone for the unilateral group. Conclusions: UltraZoom and StereoZoom provided a clinically and statistically significant benefit over the T-Mic condition. The largest gain was shown for StereoZoom in the bimodal and bilateral groups. The use of StereoZoom enabled the bilateral group to perform as well as the normally hearing group in both the challenging speaker setups. However, real life environments might provide an even greater challenge than the conditions tested here. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Cochlear implants international. Volume 20:Number 3(2019)
- Journal:
- Cochlear implants international
- Issue:
- Volume 20:Number 3(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 3 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0020-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 147
- Page End:
- 157
- Publication Date:
- 2019-05-04
- Subjects:
- Directional microphones -- StereoZoom -- UltraZoom -- Bimodal -- Bilateral -- Speech performance
Cochlear implants -- Periodicals
617.882 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1556-9152 ↗
http://www.ingenta.com/journals/browse/whurr/cii ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/cii ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ycii20 ↗
http://maneypublishing.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/14670100.2019.1578911 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1467-0100
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3292.724200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10145.xml