Rapid clinical exome sequencing in a pediatric ICU: Genetic counselor impacts and challenges. Issue 2 (9th April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Clowes Candadai, Sarah V.; Sikes, Megan C.; Thies, Jenny M.; Freed, Amanda S.; Bennett, James T.
• Is Part Of: Journal of genetic counseling. Volume 28:Issue 2(2019)
• Page Start: 283
• Page End: 291
• Publication Date: 2019-04-09
• Subjects: critical care -- exome sequencing -- genetic counseling -- genomic testing -- incidental findings -- informed consent -- pediatric -- rapid -- secondary findings -- utilization management; Genetic counseling -- Periodicals; 616.042
• DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1116
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1059-7700

Abstract

Abstract: Exome sequencing (ES) has revolutionized molecular diagnosis in children with genetic disease over the past decade. However, exome sequencing in the inpatient setting has traditionally been discouraged, in part due to an increased risk of providers failing to retrieve and act upon results, as many patients are discharged before results return. The development of rapid turn‐around‐times (TATs) for genomic testing has begun to shift this paradigm. Rapid exome sequencing (rES) is increasingly being used as a diagnostic tool for critically ill infants with likely genetic disease and presents significant challenges to execute. We implemented a program, entitled the Rapid Inpatient Genomic Testing (RIGhT) project, to identify critically ill children for whom a molecular diagnosis is likely to change inpatient management. Two important goals of the RIGhT project were to provide appropriate genetic counseling, and to develop protocols to ensure efficient test coordination‐ both of which relied heavily on laboratory and clinic‐based genetic counselors (GCs). Here, rES was performed on 27 inpatient trios from October 2016 to August 2018; laboratory and clinical GCs encountered significant challenges in the coordination of this testing. The GCs involved retrospectively reviewed these cases and identified three common challenges encountered during pretest counseling and coordination. The aim of this paper is to define these challenges using illustrative case examples that highlight the importance of including GCs to support rES programs.