Usefulness of a new online patient-specific quality assurance system for respiratory-gated radiotherapy. (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kurosawa, Tomoyuki; Tachibana, Hidenobu; Moriya, Shunsuke; Miyakawa, Shin; Nishio, Teiji; Sato, Masanori
• Is Part Of: Physica medica. Volume 43(2017)
• Page Start: 63
• Page End: 72
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: Quality assurance -- Linear accelerator -- Respiratory motion -- Motion compensation; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques; Physique -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.10.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-1797

Abstract

Highlights: Irregular breathing patterns may reduce tumor coverage during gated irradiation. We developed an online, patient-specific QA system for gated radiotherapy. The QA system estimates the dose using pulsed information from the linac. The QA system monitors dose accuracy during gated irradiation. Quality of gated irradiation per patient can be verified fraction by fraction. Abstract: Purpose: The accuracy of gated irradiation may decrease when treatment is performed with short "beam-on" times. Also, the dose is subject to variation between treatment sessions if the respiratory rate is irregular. We therefore evaluated the impact of the differences between gated and non-gated treatment on doses using a new online quality assurance (QA) system for respiratory-gated radiotherapy. Methods: We generated dose estimation models to associate dose and pulse information using a 0.6 cc Farmer chamber and our QA system. During gated irradiation with each of seven regular and irregular respiratory patterns, with the Farmer chamber readings as references, we evaluated our QA system's accuracy. We then used the QA system to assess the impact of respiratory patterns on dose distribution for three lung and three liver radiotherapy plans. Gated and non-gated plans were generated and compared. Results: There was agreement within 1.7% between the ionization chamber and our system for several regular and irregular motion patterns. For dose distributions with measured errors, there were larger differences between gated and non-gated treatment for high-dose regions within the planned treatment volume (PTV). Compared with a non-gated plan, PTV D95% for a gated plan decreased by −1.5% to −2.6%. Doses to organs at risk were similar with both plans. Conclusions: Our simple system estimated the radiation dose to the patient using only pulse information from the linac, even during irregular respiration. The quality of gated irradiation for each patient can be verified fraction by fraction.