Comparison of nonlinear system identification methods for free decay measurements with application to jointed structures. (4th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jin, Mengshi; Brake, Matthew R.W.; Song, Hanwen
• Is Part Of: Journal of sound and vibration. Volume 453(2019)
• Page Start: 268
• Page End: 293
• Publication Date: 2019-08-04
• Subjects: Nonlinear system identification -- Instantaneous amplitude and frequency -- Backbone -- Neural network; Sound -- Periodicals; Vibration -- Periodicals; Son -- Périodiques; Vibration -- Périodiques; Sound; Vibration; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 620.205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.04.021
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-460X

Abstract

Abstract: Assembled structures are nonlinear. The sources of this nonlinearity could include the jointed interfaces, damage and wear, non-idealized boundary conditions, or other features inherent in real parts. To study these systems and to ascertain if they will be operating in a regime in which the nonlinearity is prominent, nonlinear system identification techniques are needed to assess and characterize the nature of the nonlinearity in the structure. Significant progress over the last few years has focused on using nonlinear system identification to identify damage and other deviations from idealized structures. This research reviews nine different methods for nonlinear system identification (restoring force surface, Hilbert transform, direct quadrature, zero-crossing, short-time Fourier transform, Gabor wavelet, Morlet wavelet, Morse wavelet, and a neural network-based algorithm) in order to assess their accuracy. The methods are compared by identifying characteristics of two systems: a single degree of freedom model of a Duffing oscillator and measured data from a jointed structure. As neural networks are not commonly used for system identification, multiple variations of the method are investigated to study its effectiveness. Perturbation analysis is conducted to see the efficacy of the different methods for identifying parameters across a large range of design spaces, and the advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. The primary contribution of this paper is a comparison on both analytical and experimental data of multiple widely used system identification methods, and an assessment of when each method is most and least applicable, specifically in the context of jointed structures.