The speech perception after cochlear implantation: The hearing gain difference according to the implant systems is important?. Issue 3 (June 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The speech perception after cochlear implantation: The hearing gain difference according to the implant systems is important?. Issue 3 (June 2019)
- Main Title:
- The speech perception after cochlear implantation: The hearing gain difference according to the implant systems is important?
- Authors:
- Jang, Jeong Hun
Mun, Hyoung Ah
Choo, Oak-Sung
Park, Hun Yi
Choung, Yun-Hoon - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: The outcome of cochlear implantation (CI) is affected by various factors, including the manufacturer of the device. We validated the factors contributing to postoperative performance and evaluated the influence of different company devices on pure tone thresholds and postoperative performance. Methods: Our study included 56 postlingually deaf adults who underwent CI between June 2005 and March 2016. The ears were divided into groups according to the implant manufacturer: A (n = 32 ears) and B (n = 24 ears) groups. The prognostic factors for CI outcome were evaluated using speech perception at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively and compared across devices. Results: The duration of hearing aid use, age at CI, and mean pure tone threshold with the implant were correlated with postoperative speech perception. The mean pure tone thresholds with the implant (averages of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 kHz) were 27.9 ± 3.7 dB HL in the group A and 33.5 ± 5.6 dB HL in the group B ( P < 0.01). The open-set monosyllabic word, open-set disyllabic word and open-set sentence scores were not significantly different between the groups at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Conclusion: The mean pure tone threshold with implant differed between the devices; however, no device-related effect on postoperative performance was observed. Additional multifactorial analyses are needed to clarify the relationship between free-field pure tone threshold with implant and postoperativeAbstract: Objective: The outcome of cochlear implantation (CI) is affected by various factors, including the manufacturer of the device. We validated the factors contributing to postoperative performance and evaluated the influence of different company devices on pure tone thresholds and postoperative performance. Methods: Our study included 56 postlingually deaf adults who underwent CI between June 2005 and March 2016. The ears were divided into groups according to the implant manufacturer: A (n = 32 ears) and B (n = 24 ears) groups. The prognostic factors for CI outcome were evaluated using speech perception at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively and compared across devices. Results: The duration of hearing aid use, age at CI, and mean pure tone threshold with the implant were correlated with postoperative speech perception. The mean pure tone thresholds with the implant (averages of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 kHz) were 27.9 ± 3.7 dB HL in the group A and 33.5 ± 5.6 dB HL in the group B ( P < 0.01). The open-set monosyllabic word, open-set disyllabic word and open-set sentence scores were not significantly different between the groups at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Conclusion: The mean pure tone threshold with implant differed between the devices; however, no device-related effect on postoperative performance was observed. Additional multifactorial analyses are needed to clarify the relationship between free-field pure tone threshold with implant and postoperative speech perception. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Auris nasus larynx. Volume 46:Issue 3(2019)
- Journal:
- Auris nasus larynx
- Issue:
- Volume 46:Issue 3(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 46, Issue 3 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 46
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0046-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 330
- Page End:
- 334
- Publication Date:
- 2019-06
- Subjects:
- Cochlear implantation -- Brand -- Performance -- Auditory threshold -- Speech perception
Otolaryngology -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03858146 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03858146 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03858146 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.anl.2018.09.006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0385-8146
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1792.760000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10131.xml