Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. (July 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. (July 2019)
- Main Title:
- Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures
- Authors:
- Lowndes, Bethany R.
Abdelrahman, Amro M.
Thiels, Cornelius A.
Mohamed, Amani O.
McConico, Andrea L.
Bingener, Juliane
Hallbeck, M. Susan - Abstract:
- Abstract: Advanced minimally invasive procedures may cause postural constraints and increased workload and stress for providers. This study compared workload and stress across surgical team roles for 48 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (4-port vs single-port) using a task load index (NASA-TLX), a procedural difficulty question, and salivary stress hormones. Statistical analyses were performed based on the presence intra-cluster correlation within team roles, at α=0.05. The single-port technique resulted in an 89% increase in physical workload for the surgeon and 63% increase for the assistant (both p<0.05). The surgeon had significantly higher salivary stress hormones during single-port surgeries. The degree of procedural difficulty was positively correlated between the surgeon and most roles: resident (r=0.67), assistant (r=0.81), and technician (r=0.81). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the surgeon and assistant for all selfreported workload measures (p<0.05). The single-port technique requires further improvement to balance surgical team workload for optimal patient safety and satisfaction. Highlights: Workload was compared for single-port and 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The surgical team generally agreed upon procedural difficulty. Single-port increased physical workload for the surgeon and assistant. The surgeon and assistant experienced higher workload than other team roles. There is a need for more balanced workload acrossAbstract: Advanced minimally invasive procedures may cause postural constraints and increased workload and stress for providers. This study compared workload and stress across surgical team roles for 48 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (4-port vs single-port) using a task load index (NASA-TLX), a procedural difficulty question, and salivary stress hormones. Statistical analyses were performed based on the presence intra-cluster correlation within team roles, at α=0.05. The single-port technique resulted in an 89% increase in physical workload for the surgeon and 63% increase for the assistant (both p<0.05). The surgeon had significantly higher salivary stress hormones during single-port surgeries. The degree of procedural difficulty was positively correlated between the surgeon and most roles: resident (r=0.67), assistant (r=0.81), and technician (r=0.81). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the surgeon and assistant for all selfreported workload measures (p<0.05). The single-port technique requires further improvement to balance surgical team workload for optimal patient safety and satisfaction. Highlights: Workload was compared for single-port and 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The surgical team generally agreed upon procedural difficulty. Single-port increased physical workload for the surgeon and assistant. The surgeon and assistant experienced higher workload than other team roles. There is a need for more balanced workload across surgical team roles. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Applied ergonomics. Volume 78(2019)
- Journal:
- Applied ergonomics
- Issue:
- Volume 78(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 78, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 78
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0078-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 277
- Page End:
- 285
- Publication Date:
- 2019-07
- Subjects:
- Surgical Team -- Workload -- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Human engineering -- Periodicals
620.82 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00036870 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.005 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-6870
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1572.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10136.xml