Field distortion compensation for electromagnetic tracking of ultrasound probes with application in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. (4th April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lugez, Elodie; Sadjadi, Hossein; Joshi, Chandra P; Hashtrudi-Zaad, Keyvan; Akl, Selim G; Fichtinger, Gabor
• Is Part Of: Biomedical physics & engineering express. Volume 5:Number 3(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-04-04
• Subjects: electromagnetic tracking -- simultaneous localisation and mapping -- ultrasound imaging -- high-dose-rate brachytherapy; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals; Medical sciences -- Periodicals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab12b6
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2057-1976

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Electromagnetic (EM) tracking of ultrasound (US) probes has been introduced to expand US imaging capabilities and benefit challenging procedures. However, various instruments—including the US probe itself—may introduce dynamic distortions to the EM field, and compromise the EM measurements. Basic filtering methods, such as those provided by manufacturers, are usually inefficient as they do not allow for field distortion compensation. We propose to use a simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) algorithm to track the transrectal US (TRUS) probe while dynamically detect, map, and correct the EM field distortions. Methods: Combining the motion model of the tracked probe, the observations made by a few redundant EM sensors, and the field distortions map, the SLAM algorithm relied on an extended Kalman filter (EKF) to estimate the tracking measurements. The SLAM technique was experimentally validated in a brachytherapy suite. Tracking of a TRUS probe was performed by means of an Ascension trakSTAR tracking system and four EM sensors. In addition, an optical tracking system was employed to provide a ground truth to our data. The performance of the SLAM technique was analysed by varying pertinent parameters, such as the number of redundant measurements and the motion trajectory. Probe trajectories included longitudinal translation, rotation, and freehand motions (consisting of simultaneous longitudinal translation and rotation motions) in order to comprehensively simulate imaging scenarios. Finally, the accuracy of the SLAM estimations was compared with that of the standard filtering methods provided by the manufacturer, as well as that of a simpler sensor fusion technique. Results: SLAM efficiently reduced position tracking errors up to 46.4% during freehand motions of the TRUS probe. Moreover, higher SLAM estimation accuracies were observed as the number of redundant measurements increased. While both TRUS probe motions did not yield a clinically significant trend on position tracking accuracy, orientation measurements were considerably improved during translation of the TRUS probe. Conclusions: The SLAM technique was effective in increasing the tracking accuracy of the TRUS probe. Higher number of redundant sensors and favorable sensor configurations improved the SLAM estimations of EM measurements. In turn, SLAM can further encourage the introduction of EM tracking assistance in clinical procedures such as prostate brachytherapy.