Efficacy and cost of robotic hepatectomy: is the robot cost-prohibitive?. Issue 4 (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sham, Jonathan; Richards, Morgan; Seo, Y.; Pillarisetty, Venu; Yeung, Raymond; Park, James
• Is Part Of: Journal of robotic surgery. Volume 10:Issue 4(2016)
• Page Start: 307
• Page End: 313
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Robotic surgery -- Hepatectomy -- Surgical costs; Robotics -- Periodicals; Robotics in medicine -- Periodicals; Robotics -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 617.9
• DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0598-4
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1863-2483

Abstract

Abstract Robotic technology is being utilized in multiple hepatobiliary procedures, including hepatic resections. The benefits of minimally invasive surgical approaches have been well documented; however, there is some concern that robotic liver surgery may be prohibitively costly and therefore should be limited on this basis. A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed of robotic and open liver resections performed for benign and malignant pathologies. Clinical and cost outcomes were analyzed using adjusted generalized linear regression models. Clinical and cost data for 71 robotic (RH) and 88 open (OH) hepatectomies were analyzed. Operative time was significantly longer in the RH group (303 vs. 253 min;p = 0.004). Length of stay was more than 2 days shorter in the RH group (4.2 vs. 6.5 days;p < 0.001). RH perioperative costs were higher ($6026 vs. $5479;p = 0.047); however, postoperative costs were significantly lower, resulting in lower total hospital direct costs compared with OH controls ($14, 754 vs. $18, 998;p = 0.001). Robotic assistance is safe and effective while performing major and minor liver resections. Despite increased perioperative costs, overall RH direct costs are not greater than OH, the current standard of care.