Adding insult to injury: The development of psychosocial stress in Ontario wind turbine communities. (May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Walker, Chad; Baxter, Jamie; Ouellette, Danielle
• Is Part Of: Social science & medicine. Volume 133(2015)
• Page Start: 358
• Page End: 365
• Publication Date: 2015-05
• Subjects: Ontario -- Wind turbines -- Psychosocial stress -- Health effects -- Annoyance -- Green energy -- Rhetoric -- Facility siting; Social medicine -- Periodicals; Medical anthropology -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine sociale -- Périodiques; Anthropologie médicale -- Périodiques; Santé publique -- Périodiques; Psychologie -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.067
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-9536

Abstract

Abstract: Though historically dismissed as not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) attitudes, reports of psychosocial stress linked to wind energy developments have emerged in Ontario, Canada. While the debate and rhetoric intensify concerning whether wind turbines 'actually' cause 'health' effects, less sincere attention has been given to the lived experience and mental well-being of those near turbines. Drawing on theories of environmental stress, this grounded theory, mixed-method ( n = 26 interviews; n = 152 questionnaires) study of two communities in 2011 and 2012 traces how and why some wind turbine community residents suffer substantial changes to quality of life, develop negative perceptions of 'the other' and in some cases, experience intra-community conflict. Policy-related forces, along with existing community relationships may help explain much of these differences between communities. We suggest a move beyond debating simply whether or not 'annoyance' represents a 'health impact' and instead focus on ways to minimize and attenuate these feelings of threat (risk) and stress at the community level. Highlights: We use mixed-methods to understand two adjacent communities living with turbines. The study draws on the environmental stress and psychosocial impacts literatures. We trace stressors as changes to quality of life, and intra-community conflict. Social and political forces seem to explain differences in psychosocial impacts.