The newer Opioid Agonist Treatment with lower substitutive opiate doses is associated with better toxicology outcome than the older Harm Reduction Treatment. Issue 1 (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bizzarri, Jacopo; Casetti, Valentina; Sanna, Livia; Maremmani, Angelo; Rovai, Luca; Bacciardi, Silvia; Piacentino, Daria; Conca, Andreas; Maremmani, Icro
• Is Part Of: Annals of general psychiatry. Volume 15:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 8
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: Harm reduction treatment -- Agonist opioid treatment -- Urinalyses -- Polysubstance use -- Heroin -- Cannabinoids -- Cocaine; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Mental Disorders -- Periodicals; 616.89005
• DOI: 10.1186/s12991-016-0109-z
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1744-859X

Abstract

Abstract Background Charge-free heroin use disorder treatment in Italy follows two main approaches, i.e., harm reduction treatment (HRT) strategy in community low-threshold facilities for drug addiction and opioid agonist treatment (OAT) in high-threshold facilities for opioid addiction, focusing on pharmacological maintenance according to the Dole and Nyswander strategy. We aimed to compare the impact of HRT and OAT on patient outcome, as assessed through negativity for drugs on about 1-year urinalyses. Methods We examined retrospectively the urinalyses of HRT and OAT patients for which at least four randomly sampled urinalyses per month were available for about 1 year, during which patients were undergoing methadone or buprenorphine maintenance; urinalyses focused on heroin, cocaine, cannabinoids, and their metabolites. Results Included were 189 HRT and 58 OAT patients. The latter were observed for a significantly longer period. There was a higher proportion of heroin- and cocaine-clean urinalyses in OAT patients, with cocaine-clean urinalyses discriminating best between the two groups. OAT patients were older, with longer dependence duration, more severe addiction history, and received lower methadone doses. Buprenorphine maintenance was more often associated with heroin-clean urinalyses. The higher the methadone doses, the lower were the percentage of heroin-clean urinalyses in HRT patients (negative correlation). Conclusions The OAT approach was related to higher recovery and polyabuse abstinence rates compared to the HRT approach, despite greater severity of substance use, psychiatric and physical comorbidities. Our results are consistent with the possibility to use lower maintenance opiate doses (after induction and stabilization in methadone treatment according to Dole and Nyswander methodology) in treating heroin addiction. This seemed to be impossible adopting the currently accepted HRT model.