Quantifying group size in the red fox: impacts of definition, season and intrusion by non‐residents. (11th January 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Quantifying group size in the red fox: impacts of definition, season and intrusion by non‐residents. (11th January 2019)
- Main Title:
- Quantifying group size in the red fox: impacts of definition, season and intrusion by non‐residents
- Authors:
- Dorning, J.
Harris, S. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Determining group membership is fundamental to studies of social behaviour and monitoring population changes. However, this can be challenging for ecologically important solitary‐foraging carnivores such as red foxes, which have flexible social systems. We used camera‐traps to quantify seasonal changes in rates of territory intrusion by non‐residents and compared group definitions based on shared space use (spatial overlap) and social encounters (spatiotemporal overlap). Group sizes based on spatial overlap were overestimated but incorporating a minimum number of sightings (sighting threshold) improved accuracy. Groups defined by spatiotemporal overlap were similar in size to those based on spatial overlap with a sighting threshold but included different individuals, highlighting the challenges of determining group membership. Groups were smallest in spring and summer and largest in autumn and winter because all definitions failed to exclude non‐residents during the mating and dispersal seasons. However, non‐residents were recorded year‐round: over half were known or probable neighbours, and so may be relatives of territory residents. Strangers were most common in winter, when non‐residents were more likely to be males in search of extra‐group copulations. We conclude that groups of territorial, solitary foragers may be defined more accurately by combining patterns of space use, sighting frequency and social connectivity rather than considering these measures inAbstract: Determining group membership is fundamental to studies of social behaviour and monitoring population changes. However, this can be challenging for ecologically important solitary‐foraging carnivores such as red foxes, which have flexible social systems. We used camera‐traps to quantify seasonal changes in rates of territory intrusion by non‐residents and compared group definitions based on shared space use (spatial overlap) and social encounters (spatiotemporal overlap). Group sizes based on spatial overlap were overestimated but incorporating a minimum number of sightings (sighting threshold) improved accuracy. Groups defined by spatiotemporal overlap were similar in size to those based on spatial overlap with a sighting threshold but included different individuals, highlighting the challenges of determining group membership. Groups were smallest in spring and summer and largest in autumn and winter because all definitions failed to exclude non‐residents during the mating and dispersal seasons. However, non‐residents were recorded year‐round: over half were known or probable neighbours, and so may be relatives of territory residents. Strangers were most common in winter, when non‐residents were more likely to be males in search of extra‐group copulations. We conclude that groups of territorial, solitary foragers may be defined more accurately by combining patterns of space use, sighting frequency and social connectivity rather than considering these measures in isolation. When social information is not available, spatial overlap measures should include a sighting threshold. Surveying several adjacent territories concurrently helps identify the origins, and motivations, of non‐resident visitors. Abstract : The red fox is the most widespread terrestrial mammal in the world and subjected to extensive, and generally expensive, control operations throughout much of its range. However, a lack of information on the structure of red fox social groups, and the effects of control operations on fox population demography, is a major factor limiting the effectiveness of management operations. We describe the structure of fox social groups in suburban Bristol and discuss the relative merits of different methods of measuring social group size. Most of the animals we recorded on each territory were non‐residents: we describe their origins and role in enabling fox populations to resist population perturbations. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of zoology. Volume 308:Number 1(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of zoology
- Issue:
- Volume 308:Number 1(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 308, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 308
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0308-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 37
- Page End:
- 46
- Publication Date:
- 2019-01-11
- Subjects:
- camera trapping -- Canidae -- group definition -- group membership -- seasonal changes -- social encounters -- territory intrusion -- Vulpes vulpes
Zoology -- Periodicals
Zoologie -- Périodiques
590.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.cambridge.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/jzo ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1469-7998 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jzo.12650 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0952-8369
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5072.790000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10102.xml