Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. (May 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. (May 2019)
- Main Title:
- Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task
- Authors:
- Ludwig-Peitsch, Wiebke
Sirokay, Judith
Heinzerling, Lucie
Albrecht, Magarete
Baratella, Katharina
Bischof, Lena
Chorti, Eleftheria
Dith, Anna
Drusio, Christina
Giese, Nina
Gratsias, Emmanouil
Griewank, Klaus
Hallasch, Sandra
Hanhart, Zdenka
Herz, Saskia
Hohaus, Katja
Jansen, Philipp
Jockenhöfer, Finja
Kanaki, Theodora
Knispel, Sarah
Leonhard, Katja
Martaki, Anna
Matei, Liliana
Matull, Johanna
Olischewski, Alexandra
Petri, Maximilian
Placke, Jan-Malte
Raub, Simon
Salva, Katrin
Schlott, Swantje
Sody, Elsa
Steingrube, Nadine
Stoffels, Ingo
Ugurel, Selma
Zaremba, Anne
Gebhardt, Christoffer
Booken, Nina
Christolouka, Maria
Buder-Bakhaya, Kristina
Bokor-Billmann, Therezia
Enk, Alexander
Gholam, Patrick
Hänßle, Holger
Salzmann, Martin
Schäfer, Sarah
Schäkel, Knut
Schank, Timo
Bohne, Ann-Sophie
Deffaa, Sophia
Drerup, Katharina
Egberts, Friederike
Erkens, Anna-Sophie
Ewald, Benjamin
Falkvoll, Sandra
Gerdes, Sascha
Harde, Viola
Hauschild, Axel
Jost, Marion
Kosova, Katja
Messinger, Laetitia
Metzner, Malte
Morrison, Kirsten
Motamedi, Rogina
Pinczker, Anja
Rosenthal, Anne
Scheller, Natalie
Schwarz, Thomas
Stölzl, Dora
Thielking, Federieke
Tomaschewski, Elena
Wehkamp, Ulrike
Weichenthal, Michael
Wiedow, Oliver
Bär, Claudia Maria
Bender-Säbelkampf, Sophia
Horbrügger, Marc
Karoglan, Ante
Kraas, Luise
Faulhaber, Jörg
Geraud, Cyrill
Guo, Ze
Koch, Philipp
Linke, Miriam
Maurier, Nolwenn
Müller, Verena
Thomas, Benjamin
Utikal, Jochen Sven
Alamri, Ali Saeed M.
Baczako, Andrea
Berking, Carola
Betke, Matthias
Haas, Carolin
Hartmann, Daniela
Heppt, Markus V.
Kilian, Katharina
Krammer, Sebastian
Lapczynski, Natalie Lidia
Mastnik, Sebastian
Nasifoglu, Suzan
Ruini, Cristel
Sattler, Elke
Schlaak, Max
Wolff, Hans
Achatz, Birgit
Bergbreiter, Astrid
Drexler, Konstantin
Ettinger, Monika
Haferkamp, Sebastian
Halupczok, Anna
Hegemann, Marie
Dinauer, Verena
Maagk, Maria
Mickler, Marion
Philipp, Biance
Wilm, Anna
Wittmann, Constanze
Gesierich, Anja
Glutsch, Valerie
Kahlert, Katrin
Kerstan, Andreas
Schilling, Bastian
Schrüfer, Philipp
Brinker, Titus J.
Hekler, Achim
Enk, Alexander H.
Klode, Joachim
Hauschild, Axel
Berking, Carola
Schilling, Bastian
Haferkamp, Sebastian
Schadendorf, Dirk
Holland-Letz, Tim
Utikal, Jochen S.
von Kalle, Christof
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Recent studies have successfully demonstrated the use of deep-learning algorithms for dermatologist-level classification of suspicious lesions by the use of excessive proprietary image databases and limited numbers of dermatologists. For the first time, the performance of a deep-learning algorithm trained by open-source images exclusively is compared to a large number of dermatologists covering all levels within the clinical hierarchy. Methods: We used methods from enhanced deep learning to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) with 12, 378 open-source dermoscopic images. We used 100 images to compare the performance of the CNN to that of the 157 dermatologists from 12 university hospitals in Germany. Outperformance of dermatologists by the deep neural network was measured in terms of sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics. Findings: The mean sensitivity and specificity achieved by the dermatologists with dermoscopic images was 74.1% (range 40.0%–100%) and 60% (range 21.3%–91.3%), respectively. At a mean sensitivity of 74.1%, the CNN exhibited a mean specificity of 86.5% (range 70.8%–91.3%). At a mean specificity of 60%, a mean sensitivity of 87.5% (range 80%–95%) was achieved by our algorithm. Among the dermatologists, the chief physicians showed the highest mean specificity of 69.2% at a mean sensitivity of 73.3%. With the same high specificity of 69.2%, the CNN had a mean sensitivity of 84.5%. Interpretation: A CNNAbstract: Background: Recent studies have successfully demonstrated the use of deep-learning algorithms for dermatologist-level classification of suspicious lesions by the use of excessive proprietary image databases and limited numbers of dermatologists. For the first time, the performance of a deep-learning algorithm trained by open-source images exclusively is compared to a large number of dermatologists covering all levels within the clinical hierarchy. Methods: We used methods from enhanced deep learning to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) with 12, 378 open-source dermoscopic images. We used 100 images to compare the performance of the CNN to that of the 157 dermatologists from 12 university hospitals in Germany. Outperformance of dermatologists by the deep neural network was measured in terms of sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics. Findings: The mean sensitivity and specificity achieved by the dermatologists with dermoscopic images was 74.1% (range 40.0%–100%) and 60% (range 21.3%–91.3%), respectively. At a mean sensitivity of 74.1%, the CNN exhibited a mean specificity of 86.5% (range 70.8%–91.3%). At a mean specificity of 60%, a mean sensitivity of 87.5% (range 80%–95%) was achieved by our algorithm. Among the dermatologists, the chief physicians showed the highest mean specificity of 69.2% at a mean sensitivity of 73.3%. With the same high specificity of 69.2%, the CNN had a mean sensitivity of 84.5%. Interpretation: A CNN trained by open-source images exclusively outperformed 136 of the 157 dermatologists and all the different levels of experience (from junior to chief physicians) in terms of average specificity and sensitivity. Highlights: A convolutional neural network (CNN) received enhanced training with 12, 378 open-source dermoscopic images. In a head-to-head comparison, the CNN outperformed 136 of 157 participating dermatologists. The CNN was capable to outperform dermatologists of all hierarchical subgroups (from junior to chief physicians) in dermoscopic melanoma image classification. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of cancer. Volume 113(2019)
- Journal:
- European journal of cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 113(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 113, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 113
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0113-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 47
- Page End:
- 54
- Publication Date:
- 2019-05
- Subjects:
- Melanoma -- Skin cancer -- Artificial intelligence
Cancer -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Périodiques
Cancer
Tumors
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09598049 ↗
http://rzblx1.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/warpto.phtml?colors=7&jour_id=2879 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-8049
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.725100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10093.xml