Eating in moderation and the essential role of awareness. A Dutch longitudinal study identifying psychosocial predictors. (1st April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Walthouwer, Michel Jean Louis; Oenema, Anke; Candel, Math; Lechner, Lilian; de Vries, Hein
• Is Part Of: Appetite. Volume 87(2015)
• Page Start: 152
• Page End: 159
• Publication Date: 2015-04-01
• Subjects: Eating in moderation -- Awareness -- I-Change Model -- Determinants -- Obesity; Food habits -- Periodicals; Appetite -- Periodicals; Appetite disorders -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 306.4613
• DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.214
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-6663

Abstract

Highlights: Awareness of one's own risk behaviour is a key factor in eating in moderation. About half of the participants were unaware of whether or not they eat in moderation. Aware participants had a significantly lower average daily energy intake. Motivational factors predicted eating in moderation only among aware participants. Abstract: Background: Eating in moderation, i.e. the attempt to monitor and limit the intake of energy-dense foods, is a promising strategy in the prevention of weight gain. The purpose of this study was to examine which psychosocial factors derived from the I-Change Model (ICM) were associated with eating in moderation, and whether these factors differed between adults with a correct (aware) or incorrect (unaware) perception of their dietary behaviour. Methods: This study used a longitudinal design with measurements at baseline (N = 483) and six-month follow-up (N = 379). Eating in moderation was defined as the average daily energy intake from energy-dense food products and was measured by a validated food frequency questionnaire. Linear regression analyses were used to assess the associations between the ICM factors and eating in moderation. The moderating role of awareness was examined by including interactions between awareness and the ICM factors in the regression analyses using the pick-a-point approach to further examine the associations for aware and unaware participants. Results: Participants who were aware of their dietary behaviour had a significantly lower average daily energy intake compared to those who were unaware. Eating in moderation was predicted by awareness, risk perception, social influence and intention. Among the aware participants, eating in moderation was predicted by risk perception, attitude, social influence and intention. Among the unaware participants, only risk perception and self-efficacy were significantly associated with eating in moderation. Conclusions: Our findings show that psychosocial factors may only predict eating in moderation when people are aware of their risk behaviour. Therefore, interventions aimed at promoting complex behaviours, such as eating in moderation, should first focus on improving individuals' awareness of their risk behaviour before targeting motivational factors.