Using alternative scales to measure knowledge sharing behavior: Are there any differences?. (March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Oliveira, Mírian; Curado, Carla M.M.; Maçada, Antonio C.G.; Nodari, Felipe
• Is Part Of: Computers in human behavior. Volume 44(2015)
• Page Start: 132
• Page End: 140
• Publication Date: 2015-03
• Subjects: Knowledge sharing behavior -- Absorptive capacity -- Innovation; Interactive computer systems -- Periodicals; Man-machine systems -- Periodicals; 004.019
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.042
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0747-5632

Abstract

Highlights: Knowledge sharing behavior influences innovation partially mediated by absorptive capacity. The use of different knowledge sharing behavior scales had no effect on the results. Respondents share knowledge, but are not responsible for leveraging knowledge sharing. Employees seem to engage more in knowledge sharing participation than in knowledge sharing conduction. Tacit knowledge is more widely shared than explicit knowledge. Abstract: This study addresses the relationship between knowledge sharing behavior (KSB), innovation (IN) and the mediating effect of absorptive capacity (AC), using alternative scales to measure KSB. The study is original because it uses two different scales to measure KSB. One KSB scale relates to the epistemological aspect of knowledge sharing: tacit and explicit. The other scale regards the involvement of the individual in KSB: conducting and participating. Data were collected from information technology organizations, involving 248 employees, working in teams. Structural Equation Modeling was used to test the hypotheses. The results suggest that KSB influences IN and that that influence is partially mediated by AC. The use of different KSB scales had no effect on the results, which indicates the presence of the relationship regardless of the way in which the construct is operationalised. Employees seem to engage more in knowledge sharing participation than in knowledge sharing conduction. The findings also indicate that tacit knowledge is more widely shared than explicit knowledge.