Socioeconomic factors associated with outcome after cardiac arrest in patients under the age of 65. (August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Uray, Thomas; Mayr, Florian B.; Fitzgibbon, James; Rittenberger, Jon C.; Callaway, Clifton W.; Drabek, Tomas; Fabio, Anthony; Angus, Derek C.; Kochanek, Patrick M.; Dezfulian, Cameron
• Is Part Of: Resuscitation. Volume 93(2015)
• Page Start: 14
• Page End: 19
• Publication Date: 2015-08
• Subjects: Cardiac arrest -- Young -- Socioeconomic position -- Outcome -- Survival; Resuscitation -- Periodicals; Resuscitation -- Periodicals; Réanimation -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.025
• DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.032
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-9572

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: In a prior study of seven North American cities Pittsburgh had the highest crude rate of cardiac arrest deaths in patients 18 to 64 years of age, particularly in neighborhoods with lower socioeconomic status (SES). We hypothesized that lower SES, associated poor health behaviors (e.g., illicit drug use) and pre-existing comorbid conditions (grouped as socioeconomic factors [SE factors]) could affect the type and severity of cardiac arrest, thus outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients aged 18 to 64 years treated for in-hospital (IHCA) and out-of hospital arrest (OHCA) at two Pittsburgh hospitals between January 2010 and July 2012. We abstracted data on baseline demographics and arrest characteristics like place of residence, insurance and employment status. Favorable cerebral performance category [CPC] (1 or 2) was our primary outcome. We examined the associations between SE factors, cardiac arrest variables and outcome as well as post-resuscitation care. Results: Among 415 subjects who met inclusion criteria, unfavorable CPC were more common in patients who were unemployed, had a history of drug abuse or hypertension. In OHCA, favorable CPC was more often associated with presentation with ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.43–8.74, p = 0.006) and less often associated with non-cardiovascular arrest etiology (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08–0.62, p = 0.004). We found strong associations between specific SE factors and arrest factors associated with outcome in OHCA patients only. Significant differences in post-resuscitation care existed based on injury severity, not on SES. Conclusions: SE factors strongly influence type and severity of OHCA but not IHCA resulting in an association with outcomes.