Meloxicam vs robenacoxib for postoperative pain management in dogs undergoing combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and laparoscopic‐assisted gastropexy. Issue 4 (13th January 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Meloxicam vs robenacoxib for postoperative pain management in dogs undergoing combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and laparoscopic‐assisted gastropexy. Issue 4 (13th January 2019)
- Main Title:
- Meloxicam vs robenacoxib for postoperative pain management in dogs undergoing combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and laparoscopic‐assisted gastropexy
- Authors:
- Bendinelli, Cristiano
Properzi, Roberto
Boschi, Paolo
Bresciani, Carla
Rocca, Erica
Sabbioni, Alberto
Leonardi, Fabio - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To compare meloxicam and robenacoxib for short‐term postoperative pain management after combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and laparoscopic‐assisted gastropexy. Study design: Double‐blind, prospective, randomised clinical trial. Animals: Twenty‐six client‐owned female dogs. Methods: Dogs undergoing combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and laparoscopic‐assisted gastropexy were randomly divided into 2 groups. Before induction of anesthesia, 13 dogs received meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg subcutaneously), and 13 dogs received robenacoxib (2 mg/kg subcutaneously). Pain was scored with the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (short form) before surgery and at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after extubation. Rescue analgesia (tramadol, 3 mg/kg) was provided to dogs with a Glasgow pain score (GPS) ≥5. Glasgow pain scores were analyzed by ANOVA with treatment, age, and surgical time as fixed factors. Results: Glasgow pain scores were higher at 24 hours postsurgery in dogs treated with robenacoxib (2.18 ± 0.29) compared with those treated with meloxicam (0.68 ± 0.41, P = .04). Two dogs treated with meloxicam and 7 dogs treated with robenacoxib required rescue analgesia. Regardless of the treatment, the overall GPS was lower at 18 and 24 hours postsurgery when the surgical time was >40 minutes compared with surgical times ≤40 minutes, but surgical site inflammation was likely a confounding factor in this finding. Glasgow pain score was not affected by patient age. Conclusion: MeloxicamAbstract: Objective: To compare meloxicam and robenacoxib for short‐term postoperative pain management after combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and laparoscopic‐assisted gastropexy. Study design: Double‐blind, prospective, randomised clinical trial. Animals: Twenty‐six client‐owned female dogs. Methods: Dogs undergoing combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and laparoscopic‐assisted gastropexy were randomly divided into 2 groups. Before induction of anesthesia, 13 dogs received meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg subcutaneously), and 13 dogs received robenacoxib (2 mg/kg subcutaneously). Pain was scored with the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (short form) before surgery and at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after extubation. Rescue analgesia (tramadol, 3 mg/kg) was provided to dogs with a Glasgow pain score (GPS) ≥5. Glasgow pain scores were analyzed by ANOVA with treatment, age, and surgical time as fixed factors. Results: Glasgow pain scores were higher at 24 hours postsurgery in dogs treated with robenacoxib (2.18 ± 0.29) compared with those treated with meloxicam (0.68 ± 0.41, P = .04). Two dogs treated with meloxicam and 7 dogs treated with robenacoxib required rescue analgesia. Regardless of the treatment, the overall GPS was lower at 18 and 24 hours postsurgery when the surgical time was >40 minutes compared with surgical times ≤40 minutes, but surgical site inflammation was likely a confounding factor in this finding. Glasgow pain score was not affected by patient age. Conclusion: Meloxicam was more effective than robenacoxib at controlling pain in the population of dogs reported here. Clinical significance: Preoperative administration of meloxicam effectively controls pain for 24 hours after combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and laparoscopic‐assisted gastropexy, but rescue analgesia may be required. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Veterinary surgery. Volume 48:Issue 4(2019)
- Journal:
- Veterinary surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 48:Issue 4(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 48, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 48
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0048-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 578
- Page End:
- 583
- Publication Date:
- 2019-01-13
- Subjects:
- Veterinary surgery -- Periodicals
Veterinary Medicine -- Periodicals
Surgery -- Periodicals
Societies, Medical -- Periodicals
636.0897 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/vsu ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=vsu ↗
http://www.harcourthealth.com/vetsurg ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0161-3499;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/vsu.13156 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0161-3499
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9231.037000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 10090.xml