Identification of the impurity phase in high‐purity CeB6 by convergent‐beam electron diffraction. Issue 3 (12th March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Peng, Ding; Nakashima, Philip N. H.
• Is Part Of: Acta crystallographica. Volume 75:Issue 3(2019:May)
• Page Start: 489
• Page End: 500
• Publication Date: 2019-03-12
• Subjects: space groups -- convergent‐beam electron diffraction -- impurity phases -- quantitative convergent‐beam electron diffraction -- Gjønnes–Moodie lines -- cerium hexaboride (CeB6) -- cerium tetraboride (CeB4); Crystallography -- Periodicals; Condensed matter -- Periodicals; 548
• DOI: 10.1107/S2053273319000354
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2053-2733

Abstract

Abstract : The impurity phase in high‐purity CeB6 is unequivocally identified by first determining its space group, using an iterative convergent‐beam electron diffraction approach, and following this with an atomic structure confirmation by quantitative convergent‐beam electron diffraction and high‐angle annular dark‐field scanning transmission electron microscopy. Abstract : The rare earth hexaborides are known for their tendency towards very high crystal perfection. They can be grown into large single crystals of very high purity by inert gas arc floating zone refinement. The authors have found that single‐crystal cerium hexaboride grown in this manner contains a significant number of inclusions of an impurity phase that interrupts the otherwise single crystallinity of this prominent cathode material. An iterative approach is used to unequivocally determine the space group and the lattice parameters of the impurity phase based on geometries of convergent‐beam electron diffraction (CBED) patterns and the symmetry elements that they possess in their intensity distributions. It is found that the impurity phase has a tetragonal unit cell with space group P 4/ mbm and lattice parameters a = b = 7.23 ± 0.03 and c = 4.09 ± 0.02 Å. These agree very well with those of a known material, CeB4 . Confirmation that this is indeed the identity of the impurity phase is provided by quantitative CBED (QCBED) where the very close match between experimental and calculated CBED patterns has confirmed the atomic structure. Further confirmation is provided by a density functional theory calculation and also by high‐angle annular dark‐field scanning transmission electron microscopy.