Individual differences in gelotophobia and responses to laughter-eliciting emotions. (January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ruch, Willibald; Hofmann, Jennifer; Platt, Tracey
• Is Part Of: Personality and individual differences. Volume 72(2015)
• Page Start: 117
• Page End: 121
• Publication Date: 2015-01
• Subjects: Gelotophobia -- Smiling -- Laughter -- FACS -- Positive emotions; Personality -- Periodicals; Individuality -- Periodicals; Individuality -- Periodicals; Personality Development -- Periodicals; Personnalité -- Périodiques; Individualité -- Périodiques; 155.205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.034
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0191-8869

Abstract

Highlights: The fear of being laughed at was related to responding to positive emotion memories. Facial expressions were FACS-coded, joy and contempt smiles were identified. Gelotophobes had a negative bias towards laughter-eliciting positive emotions. Gelotophobes smiled less to laughter-eliciting emotions than controls. Gelotophobes expressed more contempt towards laughter-eliciting emotions than controls. Abstract: Gelotophobes (individuals with a fear of being laughed at) have even been found to express less joy and more contempt towards joyfully smiling/laughing faces compared to non-gelotophobes. However, it is unclear whether the lower levels of joy and higher levels of contempt are related to joy per se or only to those elements of joy associated with laughter. Thus, this study investigated the verbal and facial responses of 20 gelotophobes and 20 non-gelotophobes towards videos of people recalling memories of laughter-eliciting positive emotions (amusement, relief, schadenfreude, tactile pleasure). The facial expressions of the participants were clandestinely filmed and evaluated by the Facial Action Coding System (FACS; Ekman, Friesen, & Hager, 2002). Smiles of enjoyment and "markers of contempt" were coded and verbal ratings of the participants obtained. Gelotophobes responded with less joyful smiles and with more expressions of contempt to laughter-eliciting emotions than did non-gelotophobes. Gelotophobes also rated the degree of joy expressed by participants in the video clips of tactile pleasure and relief lower than non-gelotophobes. No differences occurred in ratings of aversiveness. The results suggest that gelotophobes have a negative bias towards laughter-eliciting situations stemming from different positive elicitors.