Social relationship difficulties in autism and reactive attachment disorder: Improving diagnostic validity through structured assessment. (May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Davidson, Claire; O'Hare, Anne; Mactaggart, Fiona; Green, Jonathan; Young, David; Gillberg, Christopher; Minnis, Helen
• Is Part Of: Research in developmental disabilities. Volume 40(2015:May)
• Page Start: 63
• Page End: 72
• Publication Date: 2015-05
• Subjects: Reactive attachment disorder -- Autism spectrum disorder -- Indiscriminate friendliness -- Social relationships -- Differential diagnosis -- Observation; Developmental disabilities -- Periodicals; Developmentally disabled -- Research -- United States -- Periodicals; Developmentally disabled children -- Education -- Research -- United States -- Periodicals; Developmental Disabilities -- Periodicals; Disabled -- Periodicals; Mental Retardation -- rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Personnes atteintes de troubles du développement -- Recherche -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; Enfants atteints de troubles du développement -- Éducation -- Recherche -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; Développement, Troubles du -- Recherche -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; 616.858800
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.01.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0891-4222

Abstract

Highlights: Children with ASD and children with RAD may appear to present with similar social relationship difficulties. Accurate diagnosis is of the essence; ASD is a heritable neurodevelopmental disorder whereas RAD is caused by maltreatment. The ASD group had significantly less indiscriminate friendliness symptoms than the RAD group, on parent report. There was a difference in the quality of the social interaction difficulties between groups. Structured observation was the best discriminatory tool; some misclassifications highlight need to develop tools further. Abstract: Background: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) versus Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) is a common diagnostic challenge for clinicians due to overlapping difficulties with social relationships. RAD is associated with neglect or maltreatment whereas ASD is not: accurate differential diagnosis is therefore critical. Very little research has investigated the relationship between the two, and it is unknown if standardised measures are able to discriminate between ASD and RAD. The current study aimed to address these issues. Methods: Fifty eight children with ASD, and no history of maltreatment, were group matched on age with 67 children with RAD. Group profiles on multi-informant measures of RAD were investigated and group differences explored. Discriminant function analysis determined assessment features that best discriminated between the two groups. Results: Although, according to parent report, children with ASD presented with significantly fewer indiscriminate friendliness behaviours compared to the RAD group ( p < 0.001), 36 children with ASD appeared to meet core RAD criteria. However, structured observation clearly demonstrated that features were indicative of ASD and not RAD for all but 1 of these 36 children. Conclusions: Children with RAD and children with ASD may demonstrate similar social relationship difficulties but there appears to be a difference in the social quality of the interactions between the groups. In most cases it was possible to differentiate between children with ASD and children with RAD via structured observation. Nevertheless, for a small proportion of children with ASD, particularly those whose difficulties may be more subtle, our current standardised measures, including structured observation, may not be effective in differentiating RAD from ASD.