Extraction and quantification of polyphosphates in activated sludge from waste water treatment plants by 31P NMR spectroscopy. (15th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Staal, Line Boisen; Petersen, Anne Boisen; Jørgensen, Charlotte A.; Nielsen, Ulla Gro; Nielsen, Per Halkjær; Reitzel, Kasper
• Is Part Of: Water research. Volume 157(2019)
• Page Start: 346
• Page End: 355
• Publication Date: 2019-06-15
• Subjects: Polyphosphate -- Identification -- Quantification -- 31P -- Solid state NMR -- EBPR -- Biological waste water treatment; Water -- Pollution -- Research -- Periodicals; 363.7394
• DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.065
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1354

Abstract

Abstract: Polyphosphate (poly-P) is a major constituent in activated sludge from wastewater treatment plants with enhanced biological phosphorus removal due to poly-P synthesis by poly-P accumulating organisms where it plays an important role for recovery of phosphorus from waste water. Our aim was to develop a reliable protocol for poly-P quantification by 31 P NMR spectroscopy. This has so far been complicated by the risks of inefficient extraction and poly-P hydrolysis in the extracts. A protocol for complete extraction, identification and quantification of poly-P in activated sludge from a waste water treatment plant was identified based on test and evaluation of existing extraction protocols in combination with poly-P determination and quantification by solution and solid state 31 P NMR spectroscopy. The total poly-P middle group content was quantified by solid state NMR for comparison with the poly-P middle groups quantified by solution NMR, which is novel. Three different extraction protocols previously used in literature were compared: 1) a single 0.25 M NaOH-0.05 M EDTA extraction, 2) a 0.05 M EDTA pre-extraction followed by a 0.25 M NaOH main extraction and 3) a 0.05 M EDTA pre-extraction followed by a 0.25 M NaOH-0.05 M EDTA main extraction. The results showed that the extraction protocol 2 was optimal for fresh activated sludge, extracting 10.8 ± 0.4 to 11.4 ± 1.2 mgP/gDW poly-P. Extraction protocols 1 and 3 extracted less than 9.4 ± 0.5 mgP/gDW poly-P. A comparison of the quantification of poly-P by 31 P solution NMR and by 31 P solid state NMR spectroscopy of lyophilised activated sludge showed 86 ± 9% extraction efficiency of poly-P, which confirms that the extraction protocol recovered most of the poly-P from the samples without pronounced poly-P degradation. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: 31 P solution NMR spectroscopy for quantification of poly-P extracted from activated sludge. Three extraction protocols for poly-P from activated sludge were compared. Two-step EDTA and NaOH extraction extracts all poly-P from activated sludge. Rotary evaporation of extracts gives less poly-P degradation than lyophilisation. Poly-P extraction efficiency was evaluated by comparison with solid state NMR results.