Testing the potential of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) with Colorado water managers. (July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Smith, Rebecca; Kasprzyk, Joseph; Dilling, Lisa
• Is Part Of: Environmental modelling & software. Volume 117(2019)
• Page Start: 149
• Page End: 163
• Publication Date: 2019-07
• Subjects: Participatory modeling -- Workshop -- Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) -- Decision-making -- Long term planning -- Tradeoffs; Environmental monitoring -- Computer programs -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Computer simulation -- Periodicals; Digital computer simulation -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Periodicals; Environmental Monitoring -- Periodicals; Computer Simulation -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Surveillance -- Logiciels -- Périodiques; Écologie -- Simulation, Méthodes de -- Périodiques; Simulation par ordinateur -- Périodiques; Logiciels -- Périodiques; Computer software; Digital computer simulation; Ecology -- Computer simulation; Environmental monitoring -- Computer programs; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.70015118
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1364-8152

Abstract

Abstract: Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) generate quantitative information about performance relationships between a system's potentially conflicting objectives (termed tradeoffs). Research applications have suggested that evaluating tradeoffs can enhance long term water utility planning, but no studies have formally engaged with practitioners to assess their perceptions of tradeoffs generated by MOEAs. This article examines how practitioners interact with MOEA tradeoffs and reports their ideas for how their agencies could use MOEA results. We hosted a group of Colorado water managers at a charrette, or structured investigatory workshop, where they directly interacted with tradeoffs, discussed how they used the information, and linked their workshop experiences to opportunities for MOEAs to enhance their agencies' planning processes. Among other interesting results, we found that managers' portfolio preferences diverged as tradeoff information increased and that structured information about the relationships between decision levers and performance would be beneficial for interpreting tradeoffs. Highlights: Structured workshop effectively provided managers with hands-on tradeoff experience. Interactive MOEA tradeoffs aided in creation of decision dominance structure. Increasing tradeoff info often resulted in revised and divergent portfolio choices. Managers suggested opportunities and challenges to using MOEAs for planning.